Wednesday, February 13, 2008


Is Islam tolerant?

Tim Rutten, the resident intellectual at the L.A. Times (to balance certain other contributors, a few of which I have met!), has a thoughtful review on Benazir Bhutto's "Reconciliation: Islam, Democracy, and the West," which tried to defend Islam as inherently tolerant. Rutten concluded:

The most interesting part of Bhutto's book is her argument with Samuel Huntington and the rest of the "Clash of Civilizations" crowd, who said that a confrontation between the West and militant Islam was inevitable after the Cold War was resolved. Historical inevitability always is a dicey prospect, but Bhutto goes well beyond the typical responses by Muslim political leaders. She argues that a substantial part of the work to be done to avoid such a clash must occur in the Islamic world, where a case needs to be made forcefully for more tolerant strains of Islam that are friendly to modernism and civil society. It says something about the state of affairs in the Islamic world that this is a daring, even singular, position for a political leader to take.

That said, Bhutto's contention that Islam is inherently democratic and innately sympathetic to political democracy is a bit of a stretch. Turkey is the only (fitfully) functioning democracy in the Islamic world, and there the heirs to Atatürk's iron-fisted secularism are fighting a rear-guard action. Bhutto cites Jordan and Yemen as democratic successes, but that's a bit of a stretch as well. Similarly, her categorical assertion that development and education are antidotes to Islamic fundamentalism ignores the fact that the most virulent jihadis appear to come from educated, middle- and upper middle-class families. (Consider the Sept. 11 hijackers.) Bhutto's argument for a program of scholarships enabling Muslim students to study in the West neglects to take into account that Khled Sheikh Mohammed, Al Qaeda's 9/11 mastermind, and Sayyid Qutb, a founder of the Muslim Brotherhood and ideological godfather to contemporary jihadism, both were educated in the United States -- and went away our implacable enemies.

Bhutto obviously was right to assert that the West cannot treat conflict with the Islamic world as inevitable. Like every form of hopelessness, that's a destructive -- and self-defeating -- idea. It will take more than simple goodwill and a talismanic invocation of "democracy" to make it otherwise, however. There is a place to begin the discussion, however. It's with an observation and question:

Every economically significant Western country now is home to a substantial Muslim minority, pursuing their lives and practicing their religion according to the dictates of their individual consciences. Not a single Islamic nation is home to a substantial Jewish or Christian minority, though historically many were.

Why?

The whole review's here: http://www.latimes.com/features/books/la-et-rutten12feb12,0,6111073.column

Image: http://www.korazym.org/images/ph_islam-will-dominate-world_gr.jpg

Monday, February 11, 2008



Reinstate the Irish Language on Aer Lingus

To date, there are 232 signatures for this petition ("silently corrected" by me). Lá, the paper in Béal Feirste, reports that insignia and logos may also be altered to suit the royal sensibilities perceived. Please sign this and forward it to your friends. Go raibh maith agaibh, a chairde.

Published by Daragh on Feb 07, 2008
Category: Business/Commercial
Region: Ireland
Target: Aer Lingus Group Plc
Web site: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10205170675
Description/History:
Aer Lingus have instructed their crew to stop using the Irish Language during in-flight announcements on the new Belfast-London Heathrow route.

The airline's decision has been criticised by the Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern, and Leader of the Opposition, Enda Kenny.

This petition is a message to the decision makers at Aer Lingus, including CEO Dermot Mannion, Finance Director Greg O'Sullivan, and Chairman John Sharman, that this decision is not acceptable to us, their customers.
Petition:
We, the undersigned, call on the management of Aer Lingus to reinstate the use of Irish language for in-flight announcements, on the Belfast-London Heathrow route.

Tá muidne, na ndaoine atá tar éis an achanní seo a shiniú, ag glaoch ar bord bhainaistiochhta Aer Lingus chun fógraí Ghaeilge a chur ar ais i seirbhís aer Béal Feirste go Londain.


Online petition - Reinstate the Irish Language on Aer Lingus

Image:www.socialistparty.net/images/aerlingus2.jpg

Lip Service for the Irish Language?

Tá sé litir ar an eagathoir ó Irish Times anseo. Léamh mé ar an Gaelport.com anois. Ceapaim mé smaointe go maith faoí an áit tábhachtach Ghaeilge. Ar bhfuil é beo nó marbh? Go gorta? Go gortáigh?

Paying lip-service to Irish

Madam, - I am a student of Trinity College, Dublin who is spending his year abroad in Russia. I was recently contacted by two Russian students who are writing their dissertations on Ireland. When we met, it became clear that what interested them the most was learning Irish. They refuse to have a concept of Ireland without its native language.

How is it that two students from the far east of Europe consider a basic knowledge of Irish compulsory for the understanding of our country, yet successive post-Independence governments have done more to kill the language through bad policy, stilted thinking and neglect, than a foreign power ever managed in hundreds of years?

The compulsory teaching of Irish, often cited as the primary killer, has not done as much ill as poor policy and half-baked ideas. Firstly, the language is not taught as a living one, the curriculum is dated and grammar, despite the primacy it enjoys on the curriculum, is badly taught. The result is that after 14 years, students do not grasp such basic concepts as number and case. Secondly, the zeal of the independence movement, combined with that peculiarly Irish laxity, has left us with the prevalent notion: "Irish is a beautiful language, a part of our heritage, but we don't need to speak it to keep it alive - that's for others, and sure isn't it an official EU language?"

This is the nub of the problem. We are an independent state, under no foreign military pressure, yet we will do anything to keep the language alive other than actually utter it.

Instead, we exploit it. We apply for grants because our houses happen to lie half-a-mile inside a box on a map; we send our children to gaelscoileanna, not for linguistic reasons, but because they are better funded and their students attain more points; we close our parliamentary sessions 'as Gaeilge' if a hasty exit is needed. This is how we abuse that element of our culture without which we are nothing.

Where is the indignation and anger at so many years of short-sightedness and stupidity? Where is the nerve to actually speak, with our own mouths, the language we have been 'reviving' since Independence? Does Irish have to die before anyone cares?

It's not too late. In Latvia, the Isle of Man and Scotland, people realised what was happening and did what was necessary to safeguard their culture. We can do the same, as soon as we rid our native tongue of the burdens of tokenism, bureaucracy and muddled thinking. But first, we need to use the language for the purpose it was intended - and speak it, without reserve, without shame, without prejudice. - Yours, etc,

Iain Mac Eochagain, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.
11ú Feabhra 2008
www.ireland.com
Irish Times - Lthch:
Letter to the editor

Image/ pictiúr:
[Text/taecs: "The windows were sparkling." Signed by/ scríofa le: Eiblín Ní Coclaín]
Lomra an Óir.
Máiréad Ni Ghráda, M.A.

Brún agus Ó Nualláin Teóranta. B.A.C. 125 leathanach.

Tá scéalta fiannaíochta, paidreacha, filíocht agus scéalta nua-aimseartha sa leabhar beag seo. Tá sean amhráin inti freisin mar shampla 'Séan Ó Duibhir An Ghleanna'. Gheobhaidh tú scéalta inti ar nós 'Eoinín na nÉan' le Pádraic Mac Piarais. Tá na piosaí agus na rannta iontach simplí, bheadh an leabhar an-oiriúnach do dhuine a bheadh ag foghlaim na Gaeilge. Leabhar simplí so-leithe.


My loose translation: "The Golden Fleece." There's heroic tales, prayers, poems, and contemporary stories in this little book. Old songs are also included, for example "Seán O'Dwyer from the Glen." You can find stories inside such as "Johnny of the Birds" by Pádraig Pearse. There are wonderful, simple pieces and rhymes, a book that'd be a superb treasure for people who'd want to learn Irish. A very clear, straightforward book.
www.askaboutireland.ie/image_medium?asset_id=1120

Saturday, February 9, 2008


They Haven't Gone Away, Y'know

"The Blanket" has published my article "Internal Exiles: Welsh Activism from an Irish Netizen's p-o-v." I had posted it on this blog in slightly altered form first this past month. One of the co-editors has his own blog up, "The Pensive Quill," and both the Blanket & PQ can be linked to from my list on Blogtrotter.

I wanted to let readers know that this enduring on-line "journal of protest and dissent" has returned like hodcarrying Tim Finnegan from his whiskey'd wake after a hiatus last autumn and I'm delighted that it's resurrected. As I've had the pleasure of being a contributor to it since it started in 2001, I celebrate its convalescence. If you want craic on Irish republicanism's real-world long-term health, or lack of such, there's diagnoses, prognoses, and an autopsy or two.

http://lark.phoblacht.net/SOM0208.html

P.S. "Finnegan's Wake" is a "pseudo-Irish ballad" circa 1864 Amerikay. The image comes from a band that sings it, although from the parlous LP cover, caveat auditor! http://juiceofthebarley.com/images/pub.gif

Here's the song's last verse courtesy of http://homepages.wmich.edu/~cooneys/poems/fwake.html":
Then Mickey Maloney ducked his head,
When a noggin of whiskey flew at him,
It missed, and falling on the bed,
The liquor scattered over Tim!
The corpse revives! See how he raises!
Timothy rising from the bed,
Says,"Whirl your whiskey around like blazes,
Thanum an Dhoul! Do you think I'm dead?"

Friday, February 8, 2008


Always Talking with God: St. Bruno

Studying medieval literature, it's difficult to enter into the mindset of the committed, the vowed, the pledged. Thinking of my own childhood faith vs. my adult existentialism, I wonder how those hermits endured without plumbing, with rotting teeth, without vitamins, with lassitude, for so many decades in such unforgiving climes. It's difficult to imagine monks as like us, with our post-modern angst and distrust in dogma, with our jittery need for caffeine and diversion, fortifying themselves for interior battle amidst exterior difficulties. Yet, a thousand years after this saint's example, a few continue this lifelong struggle at Charterhouses. After watching "Die Grosse Stille," (["Into Great Silence," the 2005 documentary by Philip Groening], I have practically no idea how-- I think I may know why, however. Although I do not share their total belief, I admire their utter perseverence. I imagine fitfully that perhaps their vocation balances my search through my own inscaped wilderness.

About Bruno

Saint Bruno's gift was his uninterrupted
conversation with God.

How did this wonder come to him? Without
Carthusian insights I can only guess:
there must have been at first some seeds of grace
which Bruno planted in his wilderness.
He must have watered them with tears, and kept
his little garden friendly to the sun
till the shoots came and, marvelously, flowers.
(Words were his flowers, to woo the Holy One.)
Bruno had peace, I know, but all the same
I doubt that he perceived if answers came.

And surely there were winters in his heart,
when leaf and blossom died, and the land froze,
and a white silence covered everything.
He offered God this silence, I suppose,
and his cold poverty (which few believe
that God in His warm silence will receive.)

How did this wonder come at last to him?
I would surmise: when Bruno understood
how love that crushed him had no gift for God-
though through all seasons he had sought the good-
he entered his own hut, pulled down the shades,
and sat and grappled with his pain till he
himself became the word, the total need,
the gift, the outcry, the last agony.
And one day God, most ready to discover
the moment that a heart fills to the brim,
burst into Bruno's time, sat down beside him,
and eager with delight gave to his lover
the joy of endless dialogue with Him.

-- Jessica Powers (1984)

Source: Kathe, Barbara A. "'About Bruno': A Poet's Wisdom."
Spiritual Life: A Journal of Contemporary Spirituality
52.3 (Fall 2006): 135-142.
(Poem posted to the IFSB Yahoo Groups list discussing Carthusian spirituality and charism.)

Image: Inside the monastery of La Grande Chartreuse, founded by St Bruno and six companions in 1084. Copyright: Philip Gröning. www.life4seekers.co.uk/images/foto01.jpg

Thursday, February 7, 2008


Radharc na Sléibhte i rith an Geimhreadh

Nuair bhí mé óg, chonaic mé na Sléibhte Naomh Gaibhreál os cionn tí againn. Bhí mé a gcónaí i Cnoc Glan, in aice leis na gnoc thíos Sliabh Naomh Antóine. Is leamainm 'Cnoc Maolín,' mar sin é go bhfuil paiste maol air ag barr mhullach. Is paiste sneamh go cromshlínnéanach le deanaí ansiud. Tig leat ag dul nios airde aníos ar mbun gach aimsir i ndiadh Nollaig nó Áthbhlian. Tá sé fearthainn ina ghleann thíos; tá sé leac ar na fánaí thuas.

Ach, no raibh dath ar chor ar bith ban ar feadh an bhlian seo caite. Cén fáth? Ní rabhamar baisteach go leor i An Stát Órga. Fuair muid trí orlach amháin anseo. Bheul, ábalta muid fáil an feachaint go halainn agus go mór faoi latháir. Feicimid radharc úr thar daichead míle.

Chuir mé an peictúir na réimse uaidh sean-lheibheal dó boscaí oráiste nó líomóid. Fadó, ach no raibh fádo go mór, d'imigh mé na úllord na líomóid timpeall teach agam. Bhí maith liom ag imirt ann. Chaith mé na liathroidaí buí ar aghaidh mo cairde. Rugamar na líomóid; d'ólamid sú searbh. Tháinig muid ar ais go tuirseach. D'fhilleadh muid go sasta. D'íth mé sonas riamh go raibh ag dul ag léamh i mo leaba.

Is cuimhne liom an boladh glan agus laidir na torthái bríste i deireadh. Anois, sílím nuair d'fhág na gortaí garbhaí seo. Níl an cumas agam chun é a dhéanamh ag gol ansin. Caillean an cluain ansiud. Tá crainn go milleadh. Is inneadh an radharc nuair bhí mé óg, ach fanann intinn agam amháin ansiud.


Mountain Views during the winter


When I was young, I saw the San Gabriel Mountains above our house. I was living in Claremont, near the hills below Mt. San Antonio. The nickname's Mount Baldy, because of its bald patch atop the summit. There's a snowy patch over there lately. You can go up higher from the bottom every season after Christmas or New Year's. There's rain in the valleys; there's ice on the slopes.

But, there wasn't one bit of white color during the last year. Why? We didn't have enough rain in the Golden State. We got only three inches here. Well, we're able to see a beautiful and grand vista at present. We view a fresh panorama for forty miles.

I put up a picture of the range from an old label from a box of oranges or lemons. A while ago, but not that long ago, I went off into the lemon orchards around my house. I liked going off there. I would throw yellow balls at my friends. We caught the lemons; we drank bitter juice. We went back tired. We returned satisfied. I ate happily before I would go to read in my bed.

I remember the clean and strong smell of broken lemons later. Now, I think of when I left those rough fields. I lack the ability to go back there. The meadows there are lost. The trees are destroyed. I can see the view when I was young, but I can stay back there only in my mind.

Image/ pictíur: www.blueskysearch.com/images/desert.jpg

Wednesday, February 6, 2008


Menna Gallie's "The Small Mine": Book Review

Gallie's third novel forms a sort of trilogy of small-town Wales and the tensions that, at this novel's end, draw one of the key characters off to Nottingham in the wake of her lover Joe Jenkins' sudden death in a mine accident. Like her first, "Strike for a Kingdom," this novel takes place in the fictional but very vividly realized town of Cilhendre. The book opens with a depiction of being inside a coal pit and many of its best scenes take place within its depths. Within such darkness, the words do the detailing, and Gallie pays closer attention to nuances of character and shifts in mood as conversations ebb and flow that also made "Strike" justly her best-known work. "Small Mine" too deserves attention by any reader rediscovering her small body of novels about the Welsh.

Like her second novel, the young-man-from-the-mines up to "Oxbridge" tale "Man's Desiring," Joe himself possesses talent that could have rewarded him if he had left Cilhendre. He chooses not to, at least for now, however, with dire results as he seeks innocently to save up for a car with which to court the two women he dates. His death, halfway through the novel, sets up the recriminations and emotions that Gallie evokes with a believable mixture of frankness and discretion, depending upon her indirect narration through her characters. More than her plots, her novels succeed best at delineating how people think and how they talk, and how these two moods or modes change. Here is an example. Joe's mother has just been told of Joe's death in the small mine.

"She didn't think about how to behave; shocked and sick and obscurely excited, she ran away, the sentimentality of the role she was cast to play repulsed her. She cried out her rejection of the part at first more than the loss of Joe, she was suddenly angered by the drama and what was foisted upon her. This melodrama had nothing to do with her or with Joe. She had to get away from it, out from the sentiment, out from the sick emotion. She ran out into the road and thumbed a lift and ran away and talked a little to the driver of the car about the weather." (104)

While Gallie elsewhere in this novel does show a slightly slackened control, as she loves using triple adjectives and at times shows too obviously what could be more discreetly told, "The Small Mine"-- as with the two previous books I have mentioned-- is worth seeking out. Again, her plotting remains her least surprising feature, but the affection and empathy she shares among her recognizably human and humane characters in what could have been a tidy melodrama reveals her command of tone. I wish, in fact, that the pacing had slowed to allow more insight into some of her creations, as I liked even the villains and wanted to spend more time with them. A few of them vanished well before the end rather suddenly-- perhaps too much verisimilitude to life's caprices? A forgivable fault in a writer, certainly!

I also reviewed [on Amazon US & this blog] along with "Strike" two of her later books, "You're Welcome to Ulster" and "In These Promiscuous Parts." In these, as with middle-aged Sall Door Ever Open in "Small Mine," Gallie finds her forté in her portrayals of women of a certain age who find their sexuality restless even as they edge into their forties and find their prospects for stability diminishing in a censorious and small-minded society based in mid 20c. small-town life's constrained possibilities.

P.S. I review the original edition published in 1962, without the preface by critic Jane Aaron in the Welsh press Honno's reprint. {Posted to Amazon US today.] Image:www.honno.co.uk

Tuesday, February 5, 2008



Advice for Learners: Cynghorion i Ddysgwyr / Learning Welsh: Dysgu Gymraeg
Here's a feature today which I found out via Alan Jones' handsomely presented "Independence Cymru" (see my link at right) about Janis Cortese's net endeavors. She lives a mere dozen miles away from me, with a slew of pointers and lessons for hesitant beginners in Welsh. As in yours truly. I like, under her comments on the intriguingly titled "Soft Mutation," her comparisons to Spanish.

(As a coincidence, Bo over at another blog I link to, "The Expvlsion of the Blatant Beast," has news of an interview in Aberstywyth for a position on the staff of the Welsh Dictionary/ Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru, the Welsh OED equivalent. Sensibly, he's a fresh Celticist Ph.D. from Oxford, so the trip to the U. of Wales makes symbolic and etymological sense. He apparently has to speak the language of heaven for the "prawf," or test, logically but undoubtably portentiously. His post on the language-- http://landofspices.blogspot.com/2008/02/welsh.html --has loads of additional suggestions from his own "gradus ad Parnassum." Maith thú, a chara! Adh mór ort! Da iawn, fy ffrind! Pob llwyddiant ti!)

I suppose it's a hairbreadth of a linguistic overlap indeed in any Venn diagram that ties such strands together, but it fits us eclectic lovers of arcana. For Janis Cortese and me, the mystery thickens: why so intrigued by faraway difficult tongues as Southern Californians? (Although she's a near-neighbor by adoption, a point we few remaining natives may parochially make.) Adding to our local stereotype, you can find on her homepages disparate concerns less applicable to me: long hair, left-handedness or "Sinistrality," "Hinouema" or Chinese astrology, firearms, crafts, and Marfa syndrome. Hope she gets back to Cornish one day, even if no translation of a Kernewek/ Curnoack "Harri Potter" complements the versions of volume one in Gaeilge & Cymraeg.

Janis Cortese's Welsh Pages-- http://www.io.com/~cortese/cymraeg/index.html

Image-- http://www.siop-siarad.co.uk The banner ad's titled "Learn to write and speak Welsh - Dysgu siarad ac ysgrifennu Cymraeg". A web site written by Welsh learners for Welsh learners - the terrified kind!" Count me in.

Monday, February 4, 2008


Ian Buruma & "The Politics of Resentment"

In today's L.A. Times, this veteran Dutch observer takes on the threat he perceives from a right-wing demagogue who inveighs against radical Islamist incursions into the Netherlands. It's a fair-minded essay by Buruma, who's reliably even-handed in what I've read of his journalism. Perhaps his opinion's nothing earth-shattering, but Buruma does take a moment to articulate what too few in the mainstream press do: the pain felt by the little man about the global, multicultural, and capitalist forces that overwhelm our sense of being rooted in the local, the familiar, and the communal.

Certainly with my own predilections towards decentralization and grass-roots economies I concur with Buruma's notion that these frustrations often find vent in talk-show invective, small-minded polities, and catch-phrase bumper-sticker ignorance. But, Buruma perhaps as so many among the chattering classes fails to capture the uncertainty that permeates so many of our lives today, in nations far less able to count on unions, job protection, fair working conditions, or health care. Buruma also glosses over outsourcing's erosion of middle-class jobs at the same time immigration fuels lower-paid labor that big business loves and that liberal constituencies idolize. Both parties, in America, collude in our broken borders policy. One side widens their voting bloc. The other fattens their wallets.

Buruma may argue that a populist view plays into this only from the pilloried right-wing stereotype, but I counter that the left-wing environmentally responsible faction has also been ignored on this issue-- consider the Sierra Club's refusal to support restrictions on immigration despite the ecological and demographic costs. Unlike many European nations today even in their reduced committment to benign state assistance, the U.S. appears content, on the left and right, to hack away at the worker's stability. "Let them shop at Wal-Mart" --on our suitably lowered paycheck.

I also add that for those if not like Buruma than me in the cosmopolitan mix far from any bucolic Brigadoon, a Marxian sense of surviving where "all that is solid melts into air" fits Joseph Schumpeter's definition of our capitalist behemoth as "creative destruction." Not all of us in my Left Coast megapolis welcome unchecked population growth, relentless construction of lofts and offices, and eager destruction of open spaces and soul-comforting vistas in the name of an almighty Market. Yet, my employer plans on expanding localized centers to teach students who increasingly refuse to make the commutes to our "campuses." At the same time, our campuses must attract more students even as we compete against ourselves at these smaller, more convenient locations. I asked our president, if he considers a class at 6 p.m. next to an exit off the perpetually gridlocked 405 a selling point for the admissions and recruiting staff. Seems a tautological catch-22 to me. (Given our commitment to reaching out to the "underserved" communities that fill our cities, I advised, quixotically, that any such center at least be close to Metro Rail. I told him that if we're planning for the long run, that traffic will not get any better.)

Meanwhile, as I ask a class of 25 or 30 here in L.A., how many of you have had a parent born in our region? Maybe a fifth or a quarter of the class. Grandparent? Usually one or two, the other 98 or so from that cohort born Somewhere Else that keeps our cities soaring high and our villages increasingly the havens of either a struggling set of natives, a lucky contingent of those who migrated from the cities and bought in bargain times, or a pampered pack of speculative second-home owners. Whether in the Celtic Fringe or the more favored beauty spots left in the great frontiers, we seem to be profiting off the few remaining sanctuaries left away from the same cities that fill with the "urban rich and the highly educated." As we face tomorrow a primary fixated on "change" and devoted to race and gender despite claims to the contrary, here's reflections on the disruption along with the dreams we share for our better selves, which so many Americans of every complexion face today.


So, a few paragraphs from Buruma's essay, "The Politics of Resentment":
The common man, more in touch with the real world, supposedly knows better. Uncompromising toughness, the hard line, is the only way to get results. In the United States, the word "liberal," in the mouths of populist radio jockeys and right-wing politicians, has become almost synonymous with effete urban snobs of both coasts. Liberals, in this view, are not only soft but have about them something distinctly un-American.

The association of elites with foreignness, with tolerance and with metropolitan cities, is old. Elites can often speak foreign languages, and big cities are traditionally more open to mixed populations. Modern populism -- American politicians running, or pretending to be running, "against Washington," French populists speaking for "deep France" -- is invariably hostile to capital cities. Brussels, capital of the European Union, stands for everything that populists, left or right, hate. And big cities are where most immigrants live, not in the kind of small towns where right-wing populists find most of their support.

Still, the politics of resentment does best when it can tap into real fears. There are reasons for people to feel anxious about economic globalization, pan-European bureaucracy, the huge and not always effectively controlled influx of immigrants and the aggression of radical political Islam. These anxieties have too often been ignored. There is a sense among many Europeans, not just in the Netherlands, that they have been abandoned in a fast-changing world, that multinational corporations are more powerful than nation-states, that the urban rich and highly educated do fine while ordinary folks in the provinces languish, and that democratically elected politicians are not only powerless but have abjectly given in to these larger forces that threaten the common man. Tolerance is seen not just as weak but as a betrayal.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-buruma4feb04,0,785332.story
Image:http://www.eikongraphia.com/wordpress/wp-content/pyramid-kap.jpg

Sunday, February 3, 2008


Joe Donnelly on John Edwards

Donnelly summed up, in the last paragraphs from his article in the L.A. Weekly, my feelings exactly. We need a leader to take on obscene wealth and middle-class stagnation. Yet, any mention of the 800 lb. elephant (donkey?) in our national living room remains verboten. Class war fails-- who's going to underwrite your message to the media? This as I prepare to watch a Super Bowl that charges $3 million for a thirty-second spot, and I wonder how many Indian gaming commercials I will watch then-- the tribes for have spent $88 million of their tax-free gains so far and their opponents $25 million, the most expensive proposition battle not only in our state but probably in history. Our politicians grovel before the casino owners. They divide us in the name of diversity and unity. They need us and hate us.

Often I pick up the Weekly before an election to learn how not to vote, out of my contrariness with smug trustafarianism, but I did learn lots from this comprehensive issue-- especially that the editors must have had a staff meeting led by Laurie Ochoa's sudden decision to back Obama over Hilary that led to a mass trashing of Mrs. Clinton for her sins shared with Bill over their mud-slinging in South Carolina. And I note that Edwards unlike his two opponents did not take any lobbyists' money. That's why, of course, he dropped out. So our kleptocracy works.

Meanwhile, since I posted this morning, we're about to fill out our mail-in ballots for Super Tuesday, two of the nearly half of California voters doing so. Layne now's wavering away from Ms. Rodham towards Mr. Obama, while I am stuck with the Green ballot with anti-semitic manic Cynthia McKinney and perennial Pat Paulsen played by Ralph N. as the only two candidates I recognize among the anonymously stark raving loonies. The predictably idealistic party's too namby-pamby and sob-sister for me but out of stubborn protest against the two-party system and the need for a third party to have 100,000 registered voters to stay on ballots in The Golden State, I'm doomed. Also, in gerrymandered districts designed to churn out Latino Dems from the Eastside, that cynical, corrupt, and calculating corporate cash-flow machine does not care about me anyway. I'll probably just skip to the propositions as I often do in such situations.

Off to watch the Patriots with Niall and munch chips. His classmate's going to have a non-speaking role in a Super Bowl commercial. I save up the old Sunday papers to read during the games as my ritual. Too bad Niall's Packers lost. Which is why I cheer against the Giants-- whose dull logo I hate anyhow. Although I distrust teams named not after cities but states, too, come to think of it. At least neither are Sunbelt expansion teams! My populism, like Edwards' campaign coffer, only stretches so far.


All these missed opportunities have added up to years and years of public neglect of the state of our union. What were we thinking? Well, the answer is, we Dems don't think. We act emotionally, almost like children. We get swept up in things, like Ferraro's hair or Dukakis' Massachusetts Miracle, or whatever it was we liked about him.

And now, as I listen to Ted Kennedy in the background endorsing Barack Obama, talking about the new politics of hope and change and unity and about closing the door on the politics of fear and division, etc., I can feel it happening again. It's happening to me. The sweep of history is seductive. We're in a moment when a woman and an African-American are making real bids for the presidency of the United States, and you can bleat and protest all you want, but this moment, this momentum for Clinton and Obama, really is a lot about gender and race. And rightfully so. It's cool, man. It really is. I like it too. I want a woman and a black man as president, preferably a woman who is a black man. But then I realize that despite their power as metaphors, Clinton and Obama are politicians whose filthy-rich campaigns are stocked with money as dirty and loaded as any establishment politicians who have ever run. They walk in the door compromised.

And somewhere deep inside, I know this isn't about metaphors, or about unifying us (no one person can unify us). It isn't about empty Reaganesque catchwords like change and hope. No, as we head into a deep and structural recession brought on by the callousness, greed, incompetence and duplicity (permanent tax cuts and permanent war!) of the Bush years, I realize that this is about the same thing it was about when those steelworkers were jumping off bridges in my hometown — it's about economic terror and injustice in a land of winners and losers and very little in between. John Edwards really got this; did from the beginning. Too bad we didn't pick him.

Read all about it and much more at: http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/how-the-dems-could-blow-it-again/18250/


Image: /www.picturehistory.com/product/id/13881 "1888 Populist Movement Cartoon: This political cartoon by C. J. Taylor comments on the workingman's protest against the high tariff making the rich richer and the low farm prices making the farmer poorer."

One Man's Opinion: My Political Rant

Part of this I excerpt and edit from yesterday's entry over at the "Come Back Horslips" Guestbook, one of my daily whistle stops on the Web. An unlikely forum for politics, but one visitor celebrated Obama's candidacy and encouraged discussion, and as webmistress Lee Templeton had recently mentioned James Curley "The Rascal King," and as I found that bio by Jack Beatty (which I had ordered years ago!) remaindered in my college's library, I figured I'd jump in briefly. I watched, for the first time, the two Democrats have at it gingerly at the Kodak Theater last week on TV. A frosh comp class I taught the day after needed context for learning about the argumentation & persuasion mode, so I used the debate for examples. Trouble is, none of the fifteen students had watched it. Some did not know who was running on the GOP side, one asked if Obama was Muslim, and another why the primaries had been moved up. It did not look like many of them would be voting, either.

They asked me who I favored, and I admitted Edwards had been closer to my own thinking, but with him out, I went into watching the debate neutral and left it the same. Hilary surprised me slightly by her ease, and as Layne observed before she fell asleep (easy to do considering the content), Hilary (who she favors) certainly acted presidentially, with poise. Her masterful retreat from admitting any "mistake" for voting for the Iraqi war showed her rhetorical skills at her evasive best-- surely a Clintonian characteristic. Obama lacked the polish, and the command of detail that for better and worse has remained a hallmark of Hilary's style, but his grin and his repetition of "Change" (which Layne thought would be a great drinking game, every time he mentioned his buzzword) swayed many in the limousine liberal crowd.

So, from someone who years ago took a newspaper test and found out that the two candidates way back then he had most in common with were Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader, here's adapted a CBH short political rant/ editorial before I retreat to my customary intellectual arcana.

Caveat lector. As this does edge into politics and since this thread was raised [. . .], my sourpuss snarl[. . .] Obama or Hilary or McCain, not to mention Romney, merely gives us a new boss same as the old boss-- look behind the curtain to the money and lobbyists, not the wizard's smile, coiffure, or complexion.

That Rascal King charm's hoodwinked many a son or daughter of the oul' sod. That's what the Curleys & Kennedy's twigged on to about our supposed democracy-- it's a plutocracy. And despite all of us Celts supposedly engendered from the loins of princes, notwithstanding the coats-of-arms toting genealogists or the heirs to a dubiously elevated nobility, most of us have been the wage-slaves or indentured servants a long time to the service of another man's wealth. Which candidate's seriously going to challenge-- not in platitudes but programs-- the fatal dependence upon our PAC's, corporate contributors, balkanized identity politics, disloyal employers, and widening income inequalities? Those candidates have been or are about to be sidelined, ridiculed by the media, shunned at debates, and their messages drowned out by their better-funded opponents.

As I read last night in a novel of an affluent scion-- "for him, his money, his education, his background, had made certain that he'd never needed to be anything else than he'd wanted to be. The desperation of necessity had never belonged to him." The major candidates of nearly every party in every Western nation meet this description.

I guess I'm showing my middle-aged depression correlating to this week's studies putting many of us in the lowest depths midway through life. I feel like Dante in his first canto. But, on the other hand, freed from the bog and the bedding, we aren't speeding ploughs as we scan our screens. We can listen to Horslips, celebrate Chevron óg's [Radiators' front man diagnosed with cancer] recovery, fight along with Éamon Carr [drummer of Horslips] to save Tara, and imagine ourselves both heroes in the Táin and emigrants on the famine ships, lowly and highborn both. For that, the leisure and the progress of our age deserves thanks, and I duly note that differences exist between parties and policies. Even if out of "noblesse oblige," the Ivy League's legacies may throw out a few more life-preservers rather than merely rearrange 300 million deck chairs on our Titanic. (Built in Belfast!) End of (un-)paid rambling man's editorial. Thanks for listening. Back to our entertainment previously scheduled. Dance to yer Daddy.


Image from a brief bio of James Michael Curley:www.massmoments.org/moment.cfm?mid=317 Very disappointing ratio of pics for Dickie Barrett & the Mighty Mighty Bosstones compared to the longtime mayor who inspired that annoying Beantown band's biggest (only?) hit.

Saturday, February 2, 2008


Joan Acocella on David Levering Lewis' Revisionist Muslim Spain

Lewis, David Levering; “God’s Crucible: Islam and the Making of Europe, 570 to 1215” (Norton; $29.95)

The whole review in the Feb. 4, 2007, New Yorker's worth the time, but the conclusion particularly grabbed my attention. The twist on how our values filter our understanding of how past peoples acted rightly or wrongly, and the now-pervasive intellectual rethinking, in the wake of the '60s as the radicals gained tenure, of the pieties of conventional top-down history makes for bracing criticism. Acocella admits Lewis' way with words and his vivid descriptions, but she castigates him for his imbalanced indulgence of the Islamic actions at the expense of the stereotyped thuggery of the Franks, and Christian Europe, for that matter. In an era when both cultures certainly shared a dogmatic, hierarchical, monarchical, and militarized mentality bent on subjugation and extermination, Lewis appears to bend too far in granting the Muslims a tolerance that he denies the Christians. Both depended on missionaries devoted to conversion or subjugation. Those options resisted, elimination. It appears neither empire claims the moral high ground in what may be a less convivial Spain than has been attributed by recent historians seeking an elusive siesta when the three beleaguered Peoples of the Book rested in harmony. Ask the Jews.

If, as Edward Said wrote, the old history books were covertly ideological, the current ones tend to be overtly ideological, as each new generation of scholars rides in to rescue supposedly worthy peoples who were wronged by earlier scholarship and, in their time, by axe-wielding conquerors. But all these peoples, or all the ones in Lewis’s book, were conquerors. If the Christians took Spain from the Muslims, the Muslims had taken it from the Visigoths, who had appropriated it from the Romans, who had seized it from the Carthaginians, who had thrown out the Phoenicians. Lewis does not pretend that the Muslims were not conquerors; he simply justifies their conquest on the ground of their belief in convivencia, a pressing matter today. I can foresee a time when another matter important to us, the threat of ecological catastrophe, will prompt a historian to write a book in praise of the early Europeans whom Lewis finds so inferior to the Muslims. The Franks lived in uncleared forests, while the Muslims built fine cities, with palaces and aqueducts? All the better for the earth. The Franks were fond of incest? Endogamy keeps societies small, prevents the growth of rapacious nation-states. The same goes for the Franks’ largely barter economy. Trade such as the Muslims practiced— far-flung and transacted with money— leads to consolidation. That’s how we got global corporations.

Each new problem in our history engenders a revision of past history. Many of today’s historians acknowledge this, and argue that their books, if politicized, are simply more honest about that than the politicized books of the past. This pessimism about the possibility of finding a stable truth may be realistic, but it seems to sanction, even encourage, special pleading—of which “God’s Crucible,” for all its virtues, is an example.

[Here's the complete review. I only cut-and-pasted the last two paragraphs above.]http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2008/02/04/080204crbo_books_acocella

Image: Appropriately romanticized but martially rampant from the review: "Detail of Carl von Steuben’s depiction of the Battle of Poitiers, fought in 732, the year Muslim armies crossed the Pyrenees." Speaking of Said's own overt attempts to unveil "Orientalism,' that dusky lass center stage, under a shield for the moment, looks she escaped from "The Death of Sardanapalus," by Eugène Delacroix (1827). See for yourself: http://www.humanitiesweb.org/gallery/16/4.jpg

Friday, February 1, 2008


Ag léamh leabhar faoi na fuar.

Tá sé fuar teach agam ann. Léigh mé (as Béarla) "An tImeall na Fhuadach" le 'Séan na Samraidhe' aréir, agus nuair bhí mé leaba agam ann, bhain mé níos fuar! Cén fáth? Scríobh sé faoi scríobhneoir go gorta a chaith sé á díol a scéalaí go a chead Straid na Shlua na Loinsaigh agus a dara-- nuair chaill sé na seans-- go a shraidbhaile Bhreatain Bheag bhocht. Ach, níl sé ag beir buartha go maith. Is an geimreadh. Tá baisteach go leor ann. Tá sé sneachta agus fearthainn go géar gach lá agus gach oíche. Níl ro-te amháin na tí air ann. Thig liom ag tuigeadh aimsir go gairid agamsa féin.

Ar an bpointe na leabhar seo ann, tá 'Siôn Parri' (chuir mé ainm air as Bhreatnais) ag tosaíonn ag obair nuachtan na sheachtaine. Mar sin, ní aithne air faoi 'an cló.' D'ith anraithe chneamha mhuc agus d'ól cocoa agus tae. Dhíol sé sean-rhifla. Cheannaigh sé clóscríobhan. Is mian leo a déanamh saol ag scríobh. Is maith liom stair seo.

Uair seo, fanann mé ag lorg fear ag tógáil inneall air ais a déanamh te teach againn. Níl sé anseo fos. Tá sé go deireadh. (Rinne mé seo é go raibh ag lorg dha focal amháin, "clóscríobhan," a feiceáil má dhéanfainn* é. Mar sin, bhíonn mé cárta ar feachaint briathra agus forainmneacha réamhnafhoclachta. Fuair mé "conditional tense"* faoi "déan" ag fáil sé ar an fócloir anseo. Tá dha focal tuilleadh a faighte anois!)

Reading a book about the cold.

It's cold in the house. I read (in English) "The Edge of Violence" by John Summers (I put his name in bog-Irish) last night, and when I had this book in bed, I got colder. Why? He wrote about a starving writer that had to sell his stories to first Fleet Street and secondly-- when he lost the chance-- to return to his poor Welsh village. But, he did not meet any success. It's the winter. It's snowing and raining harshly every day and every night. There's nearly no heat in his house. I can feel the bitter weather myself.

At this point in the book, John Parry's (I put his name in Welsh) starting to work for a weekly newspaper. However, he lacks the knowledge of 'the press.' He eats hambone soup and drinks cocoa and tea. He sold an old rifle. He bought a typewriter. He wants to make a life living by writing. I like this account.

At this hour, I am looking for the man to repair the machinery to heat our house. He's not here still. He's late. (I wrote this with looking up only two words, "typewriter," to see if I could do it. I did have my verb and "preposition" glance card, however. I found the "conditional tense"* under "to do/make" by getting it in the dictionary here. Now, two more words to have found!)

Image/grianghraf: Ag baisteach ar an Thuisceart na hÉireann/ Raining in the North of Ireland.

Thursday, January 31, 2008


Roland Mathias' "Anglo-Welsh Literature: An Illustrated History" Book Review

This 140-page text, with nearly a hundred pictures, gives a brisk overview of the past five hundred years of Welsh writing in English. On pg. 16. Mathias, a noted poet and editor of the "Anglo-Welsh Review," defines his topic: "it implies no mixture of blood" but "it describes those writers who by birth or strong family derivation and residence were Welsh but who, whether from necessity or choice, wrote in English." Today, of course, anyone in Wales chooses to write in one of its two languages. In the beginning, starting in the Tudor period and increasing after the Union of 1536, when Welsh historians and poets first penned texts in English in appreciable numbers they tended to emphasize dutifully the loyalty of the Welsh to the Crown. They concocted stories assuring Britons that those enthroned at Westminster traced their roots to Brutus the Trojan and then to a Welsh monarchy.

Since then, many of those included here tended to explain their country, adopted or native, to the English. The foreignness of Wales could be mined for pathos, praise, satire, stereotype, and romance. The difficulty, as Mathias charts, lay in the fact that much of Wales over the past few centuries lay off limits to most writers in English who lived in the Principality, unless they knew both languages, and few could navigate both tongues with equal facility. Most, and this tendency perhaps grows in the past half-century, exaggerate the strangeness supposedly left in Cambria with an eye towards a London publisher, and a wider audience eager for stock characters, timeworn platitudes, and manufactured lore.

The most intriguing recent authors among admittedly a vastly disparate lot united only by geography remain such as the formidably learned but intriguingly erudite David Jones, who Mathias places within a 'second movement' along with Emyr Humphreys' fiction, R.S. Thomas' verse, and perhaps the much less known poems by Raymond Garlick. These writers sought a reapproachment with the older, fading literary culture that emphasized communal duty rather than merely channelling one's muse. Mathias contrasts this disciplined mid-century faction against a 'first movement' sparked by the Joyce-like portraits of a religiously constricted and morally corrupt village that brought Caradoc Evans his first fame in 1915, and then flamed into the laments of Richard Llewelyn, Gwyn Thomas, Alexander Cordell, and others who sought in rural depictions and coal-pit descriptions a vital Welsh sensibility grounded in the peasant and the proletariat. Above all, the talented Dylan Thomas voiced his own alienation from the Welsh tradition in a language he never learned, while echoing its cadences in verbose and dazzling wordplay.

The shadow of Thomas, as Joyce for Irish writers, casts a long stretch across the second half of the past century. Mathias scans the results, and nods at Raymond Williams, John Cowper Powys, and Richard Hughes for their uses of their Welshness. He accurately observes of a less remembered author: "Menna Gallie, who wrote three spirited novels-- beginning with Strike for a Kingdom (1959) -- never adequately followed them up." (118) Gallie's predicament appears common among the later writers Mathias mentions. He finds that the most successful writing (and this book appeared in 1986) comes from criticism such as Ned Thomas' "The Welsh Extremist" and Glyn Jones' "The Dragon Has Two Tongues," as well as Raymond Williams' literary and political criticism, not to forget Kenneth Morgan and Gwyn A. Williams' histories.

In a society so anglophonic today, can the hyphen of Mathias' title still matter? He suggests that for the 'first' and 'second' movements, a counter-movement away from anglicization lingered. The 'first' usually, "involuntarily or otherwise, had an acquaintance with the then receding Welsh language and the different culture that had flourished within it,"-- that of the Nonconformist combination of radical politics and literary craft which since the mid-18th century enabled Welsh people in villages and then cities to keep moored to their legacy, much as they may have resented it, it did keep them informed of an alternative. The writers of the 'second' movement, within which I'd transfer the late J.C. Powys along with R.S. Thomas-- reconnected their own severed strands to the Cymric inheritance. But, now, Mathias argues, the involvement with the Welsh end of the hyphenated identity appears purely a matter of one's own preference.

I interpret this attitude as follows. Many live not in Wales except as a postal address-- they see themselves as part of the United Kingdom or Great Britain. The names of their towns may seem nearly as remote as the Indian terms common across so many of the United States. There's no commitment for nearly all but a few idiosyncratic residents of a land occupied by a people who've invaded and taken over another nation to learn the atavistic language or master the cultural remnants, if any exist outside of museums and monographs.

Mathias concludes that since 1950 and especially 1965 ("when the latest of the older writers emerged" from his mid-1980s perspective) the standstill of Welsh at least halted its rural erosion with an urban and school-based revival. (Same as Irish has in the past few years, perhaps, although I'd say the Gaeltacht and the Welsh-speaking enclaves both continue to decline under the pressure of both anglicized tourism and the dependence of the economy on incomers.) He wonders, in fact, if the move towards reclaiming Welsh leaves many learners too optimistically thinking they should try to write by that language's "demanding standard" when sticking to their native English'd be a wiser option and ensure the continued creativity they could bring to their work by their native means of expression. As of nearly a quarter-century ago, then, Mathias ends his reflections doubting that "Anglo-Welsh" can continue to matter as the nostalgia's vanished, the village's modernized, and the shibboleth of not being truly Welsh without a command of Cymraeg continues to shut out so many emerging citizens of Wales who have no "poor but romantic past" in either language to return to, or who wish such a retreat from modern reality.

(Posted to Amazon US today.. Image: "Hill Pastures, Capel-y-ffin, 1926," watercolor by David Jones. His delicate drawings do not transfer well, but here's a bolder vision from the commune he shared with Eric Gill. Wish it was in color! But, a solid non-Monkee David Jones website; and we all know another D.J. who changed his stage name to avoid confusion at the time to Bowie. All three were London Welsh.) www.case.edu/artsci/engl/VSALM/mod/dresch/index

Wednesday, January 30, 2008


Menna Gallie's "In These Promiscuous Parts" Book Review

I continue to search out this Welsh novelist's work, as background for my research into her "You're Welcome to Ulster," and I've also critiqued her first book, "Strike for a Kingdom," both here and on Amazon US. She sought a popular audience, and the cover of her last book, from 1986, with its curious title (a quote from Kipling's "The Elephant's Child") and the airbrushed Welsh cottage looking indeed like as her omniscient narrator comments late in the story, "a children's drawing," appears misleading on two counts. The sex remains discreet and barely PG, and despite the titular promise, there's not much action in the sack, at least for the protagonist Rosie. She's visiting her "rather stupid and uncompromising Marxist" mother Myfanwy, who had named her after Rosa Luxemberg, and definitely Myf's waspish lines remain the best here. She lives, by the way, in Krupskya, a house named after Mrs. Lenin.

An early exchange after-- shades of R.S. Thomas-- Myf's turned off the central heating. Rosie's rebuked, "you know how I feel about central heating ever since your father's sister was killed by it." When her daughter reminds her that this was only because "My Auntie Hettie electrocuted herself by shoving a pair of scissors inot a switched-on plug because she couldn't get her iron in," Myf dismises the "nasty end-- not entirely undeserved, I might add" that had befallen Hettie and then blathers on about "the citadels of privilege being attacked by the storm troopers of the working classes," forgetting that her maid's working for Myf herself to keep her ungrateful son at Cambridge, and that Rosie had been sent off to boarding school and then Oxford.

Although Rosie's supposedly back at her hometown Trenewydd from that same citadel of privilege to work on her own book, this appears never to surface again and the sabbatical's spent getting into mischief with the hapless Water Bailiff, helping salmon poachers evade said enforcer, and dealing with a dull main plot involving the Ladies of Llwynrhos, Myf's failed run for Labour, a Traveller smuggler, displaced Italians and a misplaced Italian painting.

Descriptions do enliven the lighthearted story of life in a small village. There's an extended exposition of the village as Rosie drives down into it that's a tour-de-force. I was disappointed that the Welsh Language Society's furtive sawing off of English-language "fingerposts" proved their only shadowy appearance, and the whole context of the back-to-nature incomers who swarmed into such Welsh hamlets started off promisingly evoked but the thread then became left behind as Gallie pursued the local policeman's investigation of the purloined painting. Still, late on, here's an insight.

An elderly woman worked to the bone caring for a farm commune aiming for idealized self-sufficiency sighs. Meg: "There's no fantasy, nothing fantastic, a stupid, drab, and dreary place. With a tawdry, second-hand mysticism. The alternative society. It only means choosing to stink to high heaven and wearing U.S. army castoffs. They wear camouflaged army uniforms as a symbol of their freedom, their break-out, rejection, and they don't even get the joke." (232) Gallie's at her best in her fiction when recording such honesty, in monologues and dialogues, and the vast changes that separate this tale of a not-so-young woman down from the university with her young-man-from-the-mines up to Oxbridge in her 1960 "Man's Desiring" (Jesu, joy of-- or Jesus College, Oxford, the institution founded for the medieval Welsh?) show the enormous gap between the Lucky Jim-meets-How Green Was My Valley aura of her pre-Sixties story with this mid-Eighties tale of encroaching middle-aged loneliness in a rural hideaway not so isolated, and increasingly threatened by its poor economy for the locals and its attractive amenities for the entitled.

Rosie finds at the novel's close a muted epiphany. Gallie's never been one, at least from the four novels of hers I've found so far, for the grandly intricate plot. She's most at home with characters and their interior restlessness and their half-articulate speech to themselves and to each other. This novel may not rank with those reprinted and rediscovered today, as it shies away from the social contexts that I believe goaded her into her sharpest observations. Yet, any reader wishing to imagine Wales in the era of post-hippie longhairs, Cold War thaws, and a straitened future for its unidealized small-town denizens can find them evoked here.

(Review posted to Amazon US today.)