Wednesday, July 3, 2013

California Death Trip

A few days ago, I returned after an entire week away only twenty-two miles west of home. Although the distance was short, the duration felt long. "Death in Philosophy and American Popular Culture" invited fifteen of us to engage in an intensive seminar in a residential setting which enabled us to meet and chat during and beyond the assigned workshops. Kevin O'Neill taught, and all but his wife and another participant (who'd been a former classmate of a transfer student) along with me had attended Johnston, the experimental college (now alas incorporated into the University of Redlands) where the professor had spent around four decades honing his half-avuncular, half-anarchic approach to bringing out the best by bold inquiry, to confident students in an encouraging environment open to individualized learning and consensus.

As my older son has finished his second year there, and as my wife graduated during Johnston's post-hippie heyday, I welcomed the chance to become, and to be dubbed by my classmates, an honorary member of this Buffalo (nickname for Johnston's clan as opposed to the U of R Bulldogs) community of lifelong learners. My entry {see here for testimony published the following November by its convener and we who participated} will remain shrouded to protect the names and insights shared; death's implacable gaze challenges ourselves and those around us with uncomfortable truths.  Reality and mortality cast a cold eye on what my Catholic h.s. teacher dismissed in my senior religion class as "pious pishposh"; as a monsignor he surely wearied of platitudes as a no-nonsense, bulldog-jowled, and formidably dour (at least as his public persona to schoolboys) Mick.

I fear my end as does T.C. Boyle in typically dour Mick fashion via a New York Times interview, "Doomsday Preacher".  "Since the moment of consciousness hit, I’ve been death-obsessed. Who isn’t?" Asked what he imagined his own death to look like, he responded: "We’re in our latter phases of life, so we are holding on now for the great promise of the last two years of our lives having lost our minds, having angry immigrants change our diapers for us." My sentiments, or lack of, exactly. Still, as a begrudging Mick (I admire Boyle, in fact, and met him, kindly despite his glowering mien on dust jackets at an empty Vroman's Bookstore signing table when I stumbled upon him and his great, early romp Water Music back in college days; I tucked away my signed copy "con amistad"), I aver his Frank Lloyd Wright 1909 estate in Montecito up this half-ruined half-dazzling coast must provide him some solace so he can write still more dire satire of shared humanity's hapless hubris.

Down that coast, if five miles inland, I had only been given work approval to attend two days before the seminar. The day before, I managed to wrangle additional consent for my own room. This turned out perhaps unnecessary, but my doing this freed up all but one room for everyone else to be alone. 

Imagine a room under the dining room near the stairs. 6:17 a.m. seems to be the alert for wheels to roll out above my head. My room has six spartan beds. Two metal hooks over each. One dresser dating back to the days of the original house for all I know. Three nightstands, between the beds. Each stacked with linens, a pillow, a duvet, and a blue blanket like you used to get on an airplane. I hear treads overhead often. Out of a splendid sleep night one rap jolts me so loud its rattles walls of the basement next to my form. It must have been around 6. The employees for Gelson's must park around the corner from the store, so I figure they get their payback on their customers very very early.

Yet, it is my room; propped by pillows, I type away. As I had no idea what to expect at the retreat house, envisioning a dorm, I needed solitude apart. I faced a long reading list and little chance to prepare. My own courses were in their seventh week and finals and end-term projects waited although in anticipation (and I had all but given up hope of going weeks before even though I planned just in case) had been shifted for one key meeting. So, I could work online and still attend.

Driving up the dreaded 405, I had looked first at Sigalert on mid-Friday afternoon and found it clear remarkably to LAX before green shaded into yellow, orange, and red. So, I hooked around the airport onto Lincoln from the 105 terminus and this shot me around my old college (now far spiffier and twice as large) and down to the Marina. There I navigated around the harbor circuitously into Venice, where I never had been on Pacific Ave., a block in from the beach. It jammed up, full of tourists and near-weekend traffic on the longest day of the year.  Still, I figured it beat the 405 bumper-to-bumper.

I heard the next day at the seminar of a SNL skit "The Californians" where everyone begins every conversation with such a burst as I just did. That's why it's there. And let me tell you once I hit Santa Monica and PCH. Well, about eighty-five minutes later, the thirty-three miles had been completed and I drove into Aldersgate Retreat House. It had been moved from L.A.'s Wilshire district where it'd had been built in 1892 to a new town founded by Methodists, Pacific Palisades, in 1928. Mission-Craftsman design, as a lone lodge around the bluffs can be seen here. Once home to the nation's largest Sunday School, "We Boys" flocked to beloved Mrs. Burch. Hard to believe, wedged next to massive 80s-era condos, a Gelson's, and overlooking Pali High, as busy Temescal Canyon Road funneled traffic as constant hum and the squeaks of basketball shoes on the gym floor echoed.

After a genial welcome by the director and the chef we ate and introduced ourselves. The generations spanned the history of Johnston; some from near if not at its founding four decades ago and one a new graduate, a testimony to the draw as I reckoned few students freed would return so soon for rigor. But it was rigor tempered by flexibility, and this combination for the poised student no matter the age spoke well of all gathered, for we learned or knew already to let others think things out first.

Each day for the week fit a routine. I exercised in my room, same routine I have adopted the past years, adding to it until now it's about half an hour. I ate at the fixed mealtimes, heaping up yogurt, granola, oatmeal and sometimes half a bagel or eggs too for breakfast. Lunch tended to be sparer, but the fake fajita meat was truly tasty; dinners were moderate, healthy, satisfyingly basic but varied fare.

I treated the stay as a partial retreat, and used most of my free time to catch up hurriedly if no fault of mine on the readings, and then to do my own teaching online. When the humid sun set in the evening after dinner, I walked around the bluffs, strolling past little dogs, fit owners, and their often ugly and sadly newer McMansions in this neat neighborhood favored by the quieter celebrity film set. It's a forty-five minute circle around a vast tract (named mostly after Quakers and their colleges, bisected by a Via de la Paz) that surrounded Palisades Park on the elongated hilltop from Sunset to a vista above PCH and the ocean, from Palos Verdes far off to the Santa Monica pier closer with its Ferris wheel on one side, and then the highway and tail-lit traffic always weaving its way towards Malibu past the Getty villa. Moments before reaching the bluff, the ocean entered your ears and moments after leaving its sight, it faded on cue. But I could not smell it at all; blame the muggy summer air.

Saturday we heard two overviews by Kevin in the charming Buerge Chapel; great for a wedding as you can view on the link here but less comforting for us not suited to wooden Methodist pews with neither cushions nor depth. I think he wanted to declaim there all week, but we opted for the parlor, which many said reminded them of the same rambling dorm my son and wife knew well at Johnston.

The first took us from the ancients to now, from Plato to Kierkegaard, a greatest highlights of philosophy filled with anecdotes from the classics to Kant, Marx to existentialists, and I marvelled at its range and scope. I wondered how many students had heard this in two hours (well, maybe more). 

His second overview followed American reactions to death, from the first settlers to haunted Puritans to the Great Awakening and the burned-over district, and the immense impact of the Civil War: photography, parlor memorials to the dead by the optimistic Americans confident of salvation, embalming, funeral homes (to replace parlors for an urbanizing working and middle class prone to sudden doom on factory floor as well as farm or battlefield), and the replacement of family plots in a village by once-rural, soon suburban (if a downscale area!) subdivided cemeteries outside of cities. Mount Auburn, a large cemetery outside Cambridge, featured this pattern, one that we'd soon see duplicated and updated for Forest Lawn. Post-mortem photos fascinated me: imagine a dead child propped up in its mother's embrace, a brother peering in at his sibling's bier, a toddler's final stare. The fact that ten minutes were demanded for an exposure only deepened these scene's poignancy.

The afternoon concluded with some free time. We all needed this, for Sunday afternoon we spent sharing our encounters with death. I was about 13:15, so by the time four hours-plus had elapsed as the others talked, my talk was truncated. Still, I covered some fresh ground beyond that of what one might expect, from those closer to the circle of life and death in families. My early memory of reading about how to survive a nuclear attack in the back of a black pocket dictionary (near a list of U.S. cities over 100,000) as a late Cold War child's realization; the alarm drills the last Friday at 10:15 in the morning at school as we hid under desks; the tallies of the North Vietnamese always higher than the RVN or the US forces on the nightly news but somehow we never were winning the war; the naming after a WWII only brother of my mom, and parents far older than me who people thought were my grandparents, and the distance between me and their generation, speaking of aging.

This led to my often-stated perspective on another kind of death, that of a landscape from childhood. I tied this into Redlands-bound students, whom over decades might or might not have witnessed the end of the orchards and then the vineyards as the chaparral where I played north of Claremont, my open space, turned undeveloped land into tracts, warehouses, and always another Stater Bros. I told them that the new 210 freeway rushed past that scraggly scrub which for me once filled with life.

Well, once I dwelt on my Airedale's eerie demise during high school, that typically left little time for people! My wife's aunt, her parents and mine had to be quickly conflated: "anticipatory grief" as a term I learned dealt with this as younger children had years to get used to the calls late at night, the ins and outs from the ICU, the worried waiting repeated over surgeries and consultations. I never got to my dear beloved more recent Fido, but anticipated it, as the eyes of her followed me out the door the last time as they had of my parents, both of whom I saw as the last family member and both to whom I returned to kiss as if a premonition, after I'd closed the door the first time that last time.

The next morning, Freud occupied our thoughts. I added a bit about his observation on how rapidly WWI had lured people away from loyalty to higher principles than jingoism and vengeance to serve the State. Kevin had mentioned in passing Jonathan Littell's The Kindly Ones and I looked up on this very blog my 2011 review for an apropos excerpt. (It also works well with Foucault's warnings of power.) Told by an SS officer in retrospect after WWII, this controversial, feverish novel upset many. If they had read such passages as this more closely, they might have been even more disturbed:
If the State one must serve is made up of ordinary folks, some will find themselves on the wrong side of history, then as now, not by a chosen career path or personal preference, but by the pressures of bureaucracy and the exigencies of the moment that pressure people into acting. Not all victims are good and not all executioners are evil, Aue reasons.

The State, both sides agree as do we, must exist, must call its male citizens to take lives in its name and its female ones to serve its demands. Free will vanishes if a soldier is assigned to a concentration camp or mobile killing battalion: "chance alone makes him a killer rather than a hero, or a dead man." (592) We give up the right not to kill and our own right to life, if male, he warns, to do our wartime duty to our masters.

"The real danger for mankind is me, is you. And if you're not convinced of this, don't bother to read any further. You'll understand nothing and you'll get angry, with little profit for you or for me." (21)
As I admit impatience with Freudian theory, I found "Thoughts on War and Death" much more accessible than the pleasure principle or mourning essays. A pity we had little time to nod even to Gillian Rose's "Mourning and the Law," which reminded me of a classic text unspoken this week, Antigone. Rose makes sharp contact with the camps that Max Aue's icy if picaresque tale evokes.

Heidegger, we found in Kevin's necessary tutelage, tricked us. By examining a couple of sauntering and deceptively genial passages of Being and Time, we found we'd been duped by another German's clever qualifications. Less direct than Aue, who at least wrestles with his dark angel before swooning, Heidegger's notorious reluctance to dismiss his admiration of the State Aue served (H. apparently thought like Aue however his masters and fellow servants vulgar) ties together strands worth pursuing. To think, not as trope but as a culture, that he and his ilk were reading Heidegger as a bestseller. One sign of a successful seminar is how much you come away wishing we'd covered.

In slight retrospect,  I append with fear and trembling my brave attempt for a general reader to sum up an anthology of Schopenhauer's essays, so death-haunted, that influenced Heidegger, Kierkegaard, and many gloomy Europeans. As obviously a non-philosopher, I beg your indulgence as I tried a few years ago to explain this daunting thinker to myself and the online masses.

Another title reviewed I include as it's a Foucault-influenced diatribe in decidedly entertaining fashion by a current French critic, Michel Onfrey. It's more anti-theology than a philosophical assault. Agree or not, it arguably crams in more cackles than certain gloomy Europeans, as it decries the "death wish" Onfrey finds within monotheisms. We still gaze up at the heavens, even we skeptics.

I had looked for the super moon Sunday. Tuesday, this the southwesterly photo I post shows how little it late loomed: it delayed a day or two. My smartphone leaves me very underwhelmed. For my birthday I awoke for the first time since '07 in a place where no family waited to celebrate. But this time, at least I could call and talk to my wife and get a note from younger son; older at a concert caught up with me the next day by e-mail. So we communicate our wishes these days when apart.

Derrida's Aporias (a word I never heard pronounced before; attesting to the company I keep) proved less difficult than Heidegger; its placement fit neatly as he took on previous philosophers for their lack of consistency. He dismissed Aries and sauntered past Freud. As I'd glanced in my diss. at Aries as one of the pioneer historians of death, Derrida's disdain intrigued me, although it seemed harsh.

Another Johnstonian professor and colleague, Bill McDonald, came by to discuss Homer and the Greek heroic treatment of death. This ran over 2 1/2 hours without pause. Far more lecture-driven than the symposium-reclining style of Kevin, I found both teaching content and contrast instructive.

Following at a local Middle Eastern garden cafe, we suitably surrounded ourselves with vintages. Note to self: Dohringer's Pinot Noir likely very pricy but smooth; Joe Barry's Australian Shiraz fantastic. My salmon kebab was last to arrive out of the party of seventeen, so most people had finished by the time I started my meal. But another few hours raced by, as they do when intellectuals talk about ideas. My tablemate, who'd known South Africa well, and I discussed J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, which to my surprise Johnstonians had collaborated on as a model novel to teach. I confess some chagrin on reviewing my review and finding back in 2008 I'd forgotten that 2013 would find me matched in age this birthday to its protagonist. No wonder my tablemate--going through traumatic changes this same week with fated timing--fit me into its situation, if not all its occupational hazards. Suffice to say a technical college, courses in communication rather than literature, downsizing, dogs, and the fate of one who deems himself "a clerk in a post-religious age" in a hot climate loom large.

I walked at 10 p.m., after a call home. Much darker by then, the streets emptier, the smell of wild fennel as weeds around construction sites (always more McMansions) lingered. I walked on and on. Each night, I'd precariously perch on a child's swing swung over a eucalyptus over the cliff high above the stretch towards the Pier. I figured I would not pass that way, at least after the last night.

Falling asleep I imagined a stretch limo, the kind I despised, the prom kind fifteen seats deep, would whisk us off to Forest Lawn. An Armenian man, who lived near there, picked us up at 9 a.m. in what you'd take to the airport rental agency. The air failed to reach me, wedged politely in the worst seat in the last row, so I looked out at the city that birthed me while all around me chatter of the fate of classmates--death, disappearing, disease, divorce, diaspora--engrossed some of my fellow passengers.

Past downtown, so near my house--I pointed out the hill blocking it from us as we turned from the 110 to the 5 north, it felt odd being a mile from home turf without returning there. The heat hit, and I again compared the Pacific proximity of the Palisades to the summer's glare for us more down the trickle-down pecking order.

We tumbled out likely far more giddy (no theory; practice) than most extended families shuffling into the "reception center" at Forest Lawn, outfitted like the nearby Tam O' Shanter (founded 1928 and frequented by Disney animators on what was then a dirt road as Los Feliz) in a mock-Tudor style. I had driven past this entrance hundreds of times, as it's on my way from my house to downtown Glendale with its library. I'd read Evelyn Waugh's The Loved One poking fun at this milieu and watched the James Mason film. But I had not passed the wrought iron gate since around first grade.

Galen, a minister turned grief counselor, escorted us past the desk and around the side up the stairs, the interior furnished like a studio facade of a mansion it felt to me, to a smaller room. This was were the bereaved would view a body. A video display terminal was lit behind. Many of my classmates noshed on cookies and coffee, but an hour after breakfast. I don't snack, but I do love cookies if not coffee. I wondered what the video display revealed, but instead some of my classmates peppered poor Galen with questions parsing the rights of the dead vs. the survivors. He insisted on the shareholders as it were with a stake in the property being the dead, as their rights if they signed them pre-need trumped the claims of the outraged or vengeful or upset survivors. As a (purportedly as Kevin might have it) non-denominational cemetery, it appealed to the kind of large Filipino families occupying a room like this with babies, cousins and noise nowadays more than the modest "We Boys" once there.

That trend, evidently, showed the demographic imperative. I noted Indio, Coachella, Cathedral City and Palm Springs as cemeteries among the nine in Southern California. Either land was filling up as it would in Glendale soon, or the thousands of oldsters golfing in 120-degree heat now out there would be keeling over soon, and would continue to do so for a century to come. Me included, even if neither golf nor Indio appear likely in the vicinity of my theoretical interment. Galen pointed out that "(burial)" recently had to be added in the price list as customers confused the long-standard phrase "interment and recording" of the death certificate with a video recording of said proceedings.

A classmate active in marketing pointed out later what the representative, Susan from Shakespeare's own Stratford, did not. Although a non-profit (and the marketing VP regaled us with how much $$$ a non-profit could creatively spend to meet guidelines), Forest Lawn had to pay for itself. Fees had to cover the future--one way L.A.'s Catholic Archdiocese realized in typically conniving fashion as it drained the cemetery funds to pay off the sex abuse cases as that was the only source of stable funds. You enter the downstairs area, way off from the stairs leading up to the bereavement display rooms.

There, the showroom awaits. It's not obvious. A side door takes you to a small room with urns ("a lifelong fan of the Dodgers" with space for your name to be engraved is yours for less than $500 in the shape of a cookie jar baseball; military and golf themes are also prominent), but you might not see this, as the main route takes you first to a growing product line: ashes worn as keepsakes in necklaces, as dusted in snow globes discreetly, or as what otherwise might be mistaken for another pendant, burnished with the name of the departed or his or her portrait etched into the wood or plaque. Plenty of such variations demonstrated the consumer demand burgeoning at first online and then onsite, as Forest Lawn tried to keep up with the market and with its competitors. Having pioneered in California fashion 108 years ago the one-stop funeral home-embalming-display-burial, it now faced a full first memorial park (weddings popular there too) and an aging crowd giving way to ethnic groups wanting to frolic, lament, or commemorate in previously rare fashion their own deaths.

A second room stretched out to show how military or sports or hobby themes might cater to the deceased one's past. Then, a third room angled so you did not face the center cut-away opened casket and the ones around it until you were there. Entering on the right you'd be guided slowly past the cheapest on up. The priciest was at left as a counter-clockwise (bad luck in Tibetan or Irish and many Indo-European culture as this reversed the sun's deiseal although it may be symbolic too) progress took you past marked packages. Just as at a car dealer, the bundled deals meant discounts. If you spent enough, the casket (not "coffin") was "free." It ranged from $8 to over $16k for a package deal.

I pushed down the support in the show casket. It gave a little under my pressure. You only live once.

One companion of mine, with whom I'd laughed at the Dodger urn, lost it. We were gently advised by Galen we did not have to enter the little room a bit apart in the hall of the containers and caskets. Little coffins for infants, as if large shoeboxes covered in satin, candy striped, or my sad favorite, the most expensive fabricated in a soft cover I stroked of heartbreaking wool, surrounded the viewer. My companion later explained that the sight of stuffed bears on a rocker, reminding him of his two-year-old son, brought him to tears. We reflected a few days later at the grief therapist's presentation how such a scene signified the juxtaposition of the toys of life amidst a scene of death. A child hugs a bear after he leaves his mother or father, of course. Until very recently I thought I knew where my childhood pair, named long ago Bear white with orange eyes, and Dog with torn ear, a bell within tinkling in pre-safety days, and a battered blue body, resided in my closet. But after another remodeling and another shift of my things when I was not there, they are nowhere to be found.

After another salmon kabab meal at Elena's, spiffier than it had been last time I ate there, we returned to see the showcase. I'd seen this as a pious child and still remembered it. The founder of Forest Lawn, Dr. Hubert Eaton, had taken the world's largest canvas by Polish artist Jan Styka to be enshrined on a hilltop faux-Gothic cathedral sized edifice. You can see it from the 5 Freeway for miles around, surmounted by a lit cross at night as the structure towers over the cemetery.

There, the Crucifixion and Resurrection (painted later in decidedly ecumenical and inclusive if still apparently Christian fashion by another muralist) appear in an enormous auditorium. It's curious to see the same outer sense of a holy site as in Europe, but without the interior presence of a millennium's worshipers, statues, stained glass, and altars. Instead, the air thickens as you enter the inner sanctum to sniff the same gloomy atmosphere you'd anticipate from elsewhere at the site.

The voiceover was now I suppose on video rather than projector as it might have told the backstory to me, a kid not much older than when I read the nuclear survival tips a few miles away at the Sears parking lot in Van Nuys on a blistering summer day (what day is not around here), but the story the same. For me, a resigned medievalist in more ways than one, what else could one do stuck with narrating a depiction with the Passion Play's heroes and villains, taken as gospel truth? But those around me (if not the quiet Filipino family of elders and parents who waited as Galen talked to us about grief before the showcase unveiled) tittered and muttered. They, whether raised Jewish, Christian, or nothing, bristled. Galen had tipped Kevin off to the "evangelical" content he gently dissented from, and I was curious to see what that might be. My classmates recoiled from the Cecil B. DeMille-vintage accents of the villains and saints as vocal talent, ca. 1950 studio casting calls.

Was this a vaudeville-tent revival lingering into an ecumenical era, or a white elephant atop a knoll in the heart of Hollywood-Burbank once-removed to Glendale? The museum, dimly recalled as stuffed with statues, showed these, but all crammed into the first of three rooms. They were neck and neck, Lincoln, Egypt, classics, and I wondered if they'd been relegated into a third of their former space. What took up room two were odds and ends from stained glass; even the Durer underwhelmed. Despite my admiration for this art, only a fragment of a nun's face from a Spanish medieval church moved me. I looked at her eyes and brow, and I reflected on her piety for a Church I'd moved past.

The third room was full of another Spaniard's craft. Lego sculptures. This attracted me little. I hunted for a magnet to add to my collection, but even a forlorn Lincoln for a dollar from some terminated exhibition in this same room tempted me not. I choose my additions with care, but none fit the bill.

We went to the gravesite of a seminar member whose grandfather helped create Johnston. His granddaughter (now forty) had not seen the grave due to spousal contention post-interment, so we verified, after winding around (I predict an app in a year to guide the mourners to a marker) the verdant slopes, with graves lined up all under the cut of a mower but on some steep inclines and even near tree roots by now, that indeed his grave marker boasted "He lived the impossible dream" and his widow, two years later, "She survived the impossible dream" as had been rumored in her family lore.

Someone asked to form a "Johnston circle." As an outlier, I figured this custom de rigeur. We held hands and a few people gave thanks while the classmate who is a rabbi spoke a prayer and chanted a la-lie-lie-lie sort of wordless niggun as sung at Yom Kippur. The granddaughter lay a food offering of pickles and kabab from the lunch leftovers and we paused in silence. A day after Michael Jackson's anniversary of his death, flowers and posters and a few well-wishers crowded a designated slope near a chapel. A car drove in, its window in foam scrawling out "Long live the King of Pop."

Then it was back to mid-Wilshire, not far from the site of Aldersgate originally on Harvard Ave. A surprise awaited. My wife and sons and their summer roommate (also a Johnstonian halfway to graduation) were our caterers. I knew we'd get dinner at the home of Kevin and his wife, but I was never expecting--yes, more salmon. Copper River, my favorite, and Dead Guy Rogue ale and an Icelandic porter I tried. Cupcakes with shortbread inscribed in frosting R.I.P. I regaled all with a dutiful nod to a previous birthday ambush, my 40th at the short-lived Hollywood Museum of Death.

I returned that night and under the sea-bluff eucalyptus thought as I walked in the dark past a party on the lawn of an ocean-facing manse what it must be like to see that view every day and night. Like the Donegal shores I'd gazed at from my tiny upstairs dormer six years earlier, did the residents tire of beauty? Is novelty and newness, as they tell us, the only way to wrangle fresh memory against time?

That night I closed down the house. Last one up locks the door and shuts off the light. It was me after midnight. I stayed in the elegant parlor (Kevin told us in 1901 Good Housekeeping advised readers to call the parlor not by that name associated with grief but as an affirming, American "living room") typing up and revising an idea the night before had begun to generate.

Each participant was assigned an area to introduce for that day's talk as the week progressed. I liked this. In grad school seminars I had to do this, but it was more like preparing to be grilled by a tough professor and jealous classmates about your assigned topic. Kevin, on the other hand, angled each of us towards an author or subject matching our expertise.

Well, sort of. The rabbi given a warm-up for the first of two current and staggeringly enduring bestsellers on near-death experiences, Heaven Is For Real by Todd Burpo "as told to" Sarah Palin's ghostwriter Lynn Vincent, may seem an odd pairing. She dissected its craven claims and as one skilled as a chaplain at Stanford found herself well-placed to discuss its spurious appeals, but ones which to desperate believers craving solace might not be so easily shunted aside. I doubted many at that institution carried the same heartland faith which infuses Burpo's Colorado-Nebraska border downhome appeal as Vincent phrases it, but four-year-old Colton's testimony to a rainbow horse for a purple-sashed towering Jesus who consigns unbelievers to a fate better left unsaid and prepares Dad for his place in a Last Days battle defies as any afterlife account does, logic. That, I recall in passing, made Mark Twain's sendup of the doggedly literal so telling in a harbinger of homiletic humbug and positive thinking, in his last published story in 1909, Captain Stormfield's Visit to Heaven.

Spiritualism as Kevin reminded us, and the New Age, also marked Twain's era all the way down to ours. Eben Alexander's Proof of Heaven, we learned after lunch, was as I'd suspected not titled that originally, but the scientifically astute "The X of Me" as in the unknown factor. Two participants noted how packaging of a book idea into a more lucrative pitch dominates today's industry. This Harvard-trained neurosurgeon's 2011 memoir recounts his DMT-like near-death experience, through a dark dim tunnel of the Earthworm's soul-absent, self-annihilated tormented vacuum view (shades of How It Is by Beckett if you ask me) to a spinning wheel of music and a voyage on a butterfly's wing of one he later learns (a feature in common with Burpo as the uncanny sight of a relation not familiar to the visionary prior to their submersion) is his never-known adopted sister. He gains consolation.

All is love, and you are loved. No worries. Peace and utter bliss.

Who can argue against this? Sam Harris with his own combined training as atheist philosopher and neuroscientific student does. Endorphins? DMT dump? Psychotropic E-coli? He denies Dr. Alexander's neo-cortical cortex shut down, and while Dr. A. tries in a very understated appendix to sum up and dismantle ten claims like this, I found the counter-claim of Harris cannot ultimately be dismissed. As Carol Ann Zaleski made the clever parallel in her Otherworld Journeys (back in 1987 this inspired my doctoral studies' direction) of medieval and modern NDE accounts, so I find in Alexander, whose acknowledgements and endnotes attest to a more New Age than Harvard School of Medicine orientation now, verification as in Burpo. The afterlife tends to be what you expect.

After lunch and rehearsal and revision as most of the class drove down to see mortuary statuary at the Getty villa close by, I delivered my preaching of purgatory as a performance. I figured teaching this concept from a very late medieval perspective gradually revealed might better entertain the audience than "the Lateran Council was held in 1215 to enforce yearly Confession and Communion" might.

As that barn-chapel nestled outside, I approached the classmates inside as if villagers of Aldersgate and I a wandering scholar of Irish kinsfolk who'd been invited in and had been listening to St John's parish conversations under the care of Doctor of Philosophy Kevin (trained at Cambridge as that is to Oxford as Yale to Harvard). Each of the fourteen participants played a role in my explanation.

The pastor's own dangerous leanings to German heresy, French schism, and North African infidelity must be countered by attention to orthodoxy as the Church needed the villagers' inclusion into the Communion of Saints. Joining those in heaven, those on earth by not only good works but indulgences and intercessions could give alms for the fulfillment of the penance due when venial sins could not be paid in full for the debt due them when death suddenly arrived. From the Treasury of Merits flowed grace earned by Christ's sacrifice, but even that abundant exchange was not one-sided.

Instead, investments in chantries and trental masses enabled pre-planning (shades of Forest Lawn, whose Passion Play caused me concern for it was taken so lightly, while its imagery fueled my recall of Gehenna's fires) brought the living and the dead together to move towards heavenly salvation. Three I cast as students of the Old Law despite the exile of the Jews from England; two nuns and an abbess raised funds from a generous woman who assisted orphans so as to amass alms for Masses and piety. I praised a teacher ambitious whose calling had to be that of a priest as more Masses must be daily recited; I bewailed a notary's news of a neighbor's suicide which had to prove his damnation; I comforted a widow who after Last Rites had been procured found her husband nearing heaven.

One (Kevin's wife) was the oddly devoted student of the learned but freethinking pastor; another a "healer" in whom many confided their woes. Finally, a student of the law whose "real" recital of a daydream of being chased by a bear as a more fitting Alaskan death than overdosing on Benadryl generated my earnest appeal to turn from disbelief and pagan, diabolic temptation to tell a tale worthy of a shrine, where pilgrims might flock to hear of a purgatorial deliverance into the arms of the Savior. I tried to convey this with humor and wit, but also feeling and intellect, as if a proto- phenomenonological dramatization advocating this doctrine against Lutherans and Lollards, in its last gasp as Thomas More's purgatorial treatise yet met with defender of the faith King Henry's trust.

My alliterative, elongated in a tinge of archaic style if as lyrical nearly early modern English, exemplum met with applause, and doubly. I was happy. As I confessed later to the "notary" and "law student," I wasn't the creative type. It sprang into my mind as a quick flash to enlighten a doctrine lively and compelling to a modern, dim, sensibility far removed from any sense of what made it once so vivid in the imagination. Feeling stymied when it comes to creativity rather than criticism, two poems hovered. I'd picked for my poetry contributions Emily Dickinson's I heard a Fly buzz when I died and Christian Wiman's untitled verse beginning and ending his new memoir My Bright Abyss.

When asked about my own views of the afterlife, I recalled the white light somehow earned at the conclusion of the film The Unbearable Lightness of Being, and Teilhard de Chardin's immanence. Intellectually, that model of the Jesuit theologian combined with the nibbana into where the candle's flame drifts once vanished jibes with what others had surmised that week, nature's energy transfer. Whether I believe in Teilhard's Noosphere I find it logically impossible to say, but it's a fun concept.

That evening, we convened around a circle, pizzas at the long table. I asked in our look back how Johnstonians regarded what they learned in the bustle of the give and take of a seminar education. What did they manage to keep when entering higher education or the corporate or business world? Some revealed they continued to be the outspoken, the negotiators, those who wouldn't accept the usual deal. My education never fostered these qualities nor did my upbringing, but my son and wife's did. Kevin noted how the less quick (like myself) at a quick parry and thrust might have in meetings or papers more chances to express themselves, and how the consensus-building favored some types.

Here as there, in Bill's session too, I could see this. But I also understood how patiently Kevin and my classmates let the week unfold, as we listened far more intently. At academic conferences, the speakers demand attention and expect acquiescence. You may casually meet a professor and share what you've written or read, but it's also a forum to make one's mark. At Aldersgate, far fewer egos clashed. The enrollment was large enough to let all kinds of personality types attend but small enough so you could follow each person's train of thought. A few minor differences among participants only deepened the knowledge gleaned as airless theory met atmospheric enclosure of death as a site--a grave at Forest Lawn, and a real person among us who had yet to mourn at a gravesite--and not an existential situation to be pondered only in a seminar room or a densely composed monograph. The presence of a recent widow among us and those recently grieving heightened this sense of relevance.

We spoke of such wisdom earned. Kevin was given as a gift from us a very rare book he did not have, a first edition of collected 1890s small town stoic and forlorn photography, Wisconsin Death Trip. Then I went for my last walk around the circuit. Unlike all other nights, a marine layer moved in. Not really fog, but mist even if you did not sense it on face or hair. I walked through it, a novelty in late June. Where I live, the fog never gets that far inland. I wish it did. I'd love to live above that shore.

At the very end of the bluff portion, in my solitary trudge I almost crashed into three classmates going the opposite direction. Naturally, we halted. They--the teacher, the nun who raised funds and wrote verse, and the law student in my saga-- waited for a fourth, the notary, who arrived soon with a paper bag. A $40 pinot noir (or so it seemed) had been procured at half the price, for nobody could figure out at the store the price as it lacked a bar code. He bargained. We passed around the bottle of a quite tasty vintage I had no idea of label or provenance. We stood around for an hour, the vista totally reduced to dim lights of cars and the hum of PCH traffic along an ocean invisible and one whose surf could not be discerned a few hundred feet away and maybe a hundred-odd feet above the sand.

We Gen-Xers (ok, I'm the first year as an echo boomer) talked of job layoffs and of firings, and then three drifted to a bench. I talked with the fourth about canon law until we all realized the teens around us had vanished. Figuring we'd better vamoose before the posh neighbors noticed, we walked up leafy and shadowy Radcliffe Ave. Soon we met nearly half a dozen classmates, back from a bar, and we combined to trek back to teetotaling Aldersgate (named after the tree under which John Wesley began his ministry; a tree next to Buerge chapel there rose splendidly). There, I spent another few hours, first with listening in on a discussion of Stephen King, and then going to a outdoors fire (!) to chat with my son's former classmate--the sword-wielding secret student of the Old Law up the northern coast, about to go off to SIU for graduate studies in philosophy. We conversed about in turn Sherlock Holmes' t.v. adaptations one British, one American now aired, Tolkien's The Children of Hurin, Marion Zimmer Bradley's The Mists of Avalon, Mongolian beliefs, Indonesian languages, medieval weaponry, the Torah portions on Amalek and on the first seven plagues, and more Tolkien.

Midnight ended the novelty of an inviting fire near an ocean at night in the open air. The last day we met to learn about grief counseling. This reiterated what Kevin and others taught. Grief whether from death or not must be faced and not rushed past. It has no set stages or deadlines, and it cannot be avoided. It may delay and hit in many ways, if the one who has gone has been there for you in many ways and many roles now left unfilled and waiting to enter your reveries. But between nine months and sixteen, if you are resilient, grief may fade. I reflected to myself on how a year's passing as yahrzeit or anniversary symbolizes this event. A woman of Polish Jewish parentage, elderly, told of her work as a therapist, of what to expect when you're lamenting. It sounded harrowing. I took notes, knowing I would need these again sooner or later. "If you stand with one foot in the future and one in the past, you piss on today." I asked her if that was Yiddish. She did not know, but I suspect such.

At lunch, I reflected with two classmates. I continued to remain rather reticent (and I do so in this entry to preserve some individual and mutual privacy as the nature of this week continues to percolate and simmer inside those of us there), but the intimacy of the gathering and the fleeting but necessary bonding allowed us to confide. I had come here dragged down. I felt my work not rewarded enough by emotional support and intellectual stimulation. I wondered what a death seminar would do to deepen my malaise. What I learned during of all moments a poetry discussion was the need to live for now, a truism but as poets better trained than I can express, one worth expressing.

One by one earlier that morning in the chapel and through lunch, people departed for flights. We each hugged each in turn each time, with a few personal words added. Despite (shared by the teacher) an aversion to hugs with those I barely knew, I felt the hugs were necessary and earned, as had been the hand-holding at the grave. (I only learned later that this was not a Johnston tradition, to my surprise). The night before the healer spoke what I'd been thinking that week. On our deathbed, some of us might remember our meeting place. Repeating it that last morning in chapel, the healer left with tears.

Finally, it was my turn. Only two others remained in the silent parlor. We hung around a while: they checked online for directions and I watched as my Sigalert colored the 10 freeway eastward red. One was heading north to the 101 up the coast and the other south on the 5 to San Diego. Then I hugged. Thick traffic clogged all the way up Sunset Blvd. I passed where I had submitted my dissertation, where I had bought LPs, where I had taught, where I had eaten, where my sons went to grade school. A few blocks from where my wife--we married twenty-two years ago that past Sunday--worked and blocks from where I first set in motion the way we'd meet.

Inland, to where Southwest temperatures hit record highs for June. Less chaparral always as the city exurbs stretched east, warmer weather as we paved under the cooler soil. Twenty-two miles to home.

Monday, July 1, 2013

John Andrew Fredrick's "The King of Good Intentions": Book Review

After seventeen albums, The Black Watch's singer-songwriter-guitarist steps aside from his Los Angeles gigs and, in what must be at least semi-autobiographical, narrates the indie-rock predicaments of a certain John, who falls for musical prodigy Jenny. It's a brisk, bittersweet novel. Propelled by the wry, overly clever, self-mocking, playfully second-person address John adopts for his picaresque tale of The King of Good Intentions (also an album title by the author's band), his energetic patter revives the early '90s.

Record stores still held trash and treasure: if you too can account for not only the Verlaines but Look Blue Go Purple or the Able Tasmans, you're matched with this novel's milieu. College rock still beckoned literate slackers in gentrifying, faux-boho Hollywood. On trendy Melrose Avenue, "shop girls" posed, "endlessly puffing accessory cigarettes and wearing looks that dared you, just dared you to enter and browse without buying".

Meanwhile, John settles (where on his ungarnished pasta budget he stays mum that it's all but impossible to find a room) in rent-controlled Santa Monica. There--departing Santa Barbara's lotus-land surfer environs, after stints exhaustively detailed in near-David Foster Wallace recall at a sports-mad prep school, but barely mentioned at an English university--John settles down near the beach. Ennui appears to account for why he left his privileged upbringing, as he chooses to hunker down beside the strung-out and bong-bemused natives, even if nobody's truly from L.A., naturally.

As a native, I've heard before John's jaundiced takes on our speech, snobs, smog, sprawl. Not bad, but familiar. What's fresh: his vocabulary. A Ph.D. in English from U.C. Santa Barbara, John Andrew Fredrick combines the rhetorical reach and tragicomic smarts of Alexander Theroux with the published-but-perished plights of James Hynes' erudite if long-matriculated protagonists. In John's first two-dozen pages we find "glabrous", "hispid", "viscid", and "anosmic". He observes with a gentler tone his bedroom, with "crumpled up pages like inscribed paper flowers".

At a party full of star-struck wannabees, pursuing a comely lass, he reflects: "tonight I am lost and have eyes like a spirograph in the hands of a child on methamphetamine and utterly out of my head on good drugs and bad alcohol". Poetic or introspective registers carom off John's R-rated vernacular, the usual Angeleno's articulation, or its lack. Infusing this spirited or spiteful melange of mundane rants and muttering satire, the novel celebrates an egghead's low-life lived at the margins of celebrity.

Fredrick sharpens as he hones his literate and pop-cultural dissections. L.A.'s full of inked and pierced, fringe, self-titled scribblers. Yet, as one signature writer betrays by John's reaction, Charles Bukowski's "precious, hipster-hallowed novels are like literature for people who don't really read". 

Unsurprisingly, neither do students. John's day job as a L.A. public-school substitute rang too true.  (Old Volvos trundled John and me to concrete classrooms. As I studied for a master's, I supported myself in this same occupation, and as and after I finished my doctorate in English during this same span, I dealt daily with urban "at-risk youth" in this very district. I think I know the real "William Westmoreland H.S." campus where John's violent showdown with an teenaged upstart occurs.) When you find this indie-press title in an indie bookstore, flip to page 110 to seal the deal. Fredrick's pitch-(im)perfect rendering of an instructional note left by the regular teacher John replaces sums up this novel's sass. John offers advice if you're caught in this hapless vocation: "Usually the more violent the film, the more tractable the class."

The "faux 18th century-chocolate house way" favored twice by John, first to relate his run-in with a teacher's lounge "Beldam" rather than alas "nubile Hoydens in hot pink Hot Pants" and later to his courting of a "a quite fetching neo-goth Temptress, Wench, and Strumpet" shifts the mood and livens the prose. This sub takes his spare copy of Boswell's Life of Johnson for downtime. Not that I expected another "Oxen of the Sun" rhetorical imitation as in Joyce's Ulysses, but the antiquated stylistic homage broadened the verbal range chosen by Fredrick, as a lateral side-step from the sneers of record store clerk Scather or lecherous scientist Psycho, as two of John's oft-present and quite rambling interlocutors. Parts of the novel, especially after John and Jenny find delight, slow down as happiness glows. "When she came out and came in to her room, all hot and red, I pulled her to me by the robe's lapels and kissed her on presented cheek, tonguing aside wet strands of resplendent hair." Fredrick conveys intimacy's warmth through the couple convincingly.

However, a long detour down memory lane to "Junior" on the mound at prep school, while it will lead in time-tested fictional coincidence to a sudden reunion later, slows the frenetic pace in the sunnier second half. This episode rises to a splendidly ribald "singular cheer" for John-as-Junior as he pitches, so a raunchy pay-off proves rewarding even if you lack patience for adolescent athletics. Tonal irregularities and digressing recollections may be true to an extremely intelligent John as told by an equally smart Fredrick. But, along with some typos for proper nouns in the copy I was provided, they needed a red pencil.

All the same, these add up as minor flaws. Each section comes titled with a well-chosen lyrical snippet from a rock song. (At least two other albums by The Black Watch nestle into the chapters as words or phrases.) The novel as a whole thrives on accurate observations from L.A.'s post-riot clouded yet college rock-cheered milieu, which Fredrick channels through John's grumpy good nature. The King of Good Intentions depicts scenes that have not yet vanished, although most of its record stores have, on shady blocks off Melrose or Wilshire. A paramour lives in a 1920s-era apartment flat. "Cherry hardwood floors. A dwarf sort of balcony."  See-through curtains, a cat, or a cat smell, while the fragrance of incense lingers. "Posters of Patti Smith, Robert Smith, The Smiths."

In such moments, and as the novel flows to its elegant, fittingly ambiguous conclusion, The King of Good Intentions fulfills its aims. John and Jenny's band, the Weird Sisters, cut an album. John's ambitions stay modest, but sincere. From such a plastic artifact, beauty might emerge: "Someone like me might be consoled by music and lyrics that evoked concerns that people had every day. They might be reminded for two sides of an LP that someone else thought like they did--or differently."

The last scene's dialogue will be drowned out by music, a too-loud horn blast added to a band bashing out "Strawberry Fields Forever". Appropriately, both narrating John "as an ideal listener" and Fredrick as a singer and a lyricist know when to let the song take over. The performer steps back from center stage, while words give way to sound. (As above to PopMatters 5-8-13; slightly edited and reshuffled for Amazon 4-30-13.)

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Crannaí agus Sliabh Maolín

Is cuimhne liom an radharc chomh seo. Rúgadh mé in aice leis anseo. Chuir an grianghraf i gCovina nuair ag fásadh úlloird go leor fadó.

Thóg Clarence Tucker seo. Measaim go raibh séisean féin is óige ansin. Bhí amharc seo i 1900. Ar ndóigh, fuair sé bás i 1970.

Ar feadh an bliain sin, bhí mé óg freisin. Bhí mé i gcónaí i Claremont, D'imirt mé leis mo chairde ina h-úlloird na crannaí líomóide ar chúl mó thí.

Chonaic mé an sliabh ceanna leis sneachta. Tá Sliabh Naomh Antoine go hoifigúil ann. Ach, glaoch gach duine áitúil leis an leasainm é "Sliabh Maolín."

Tá sé thart ar deich míle míle ard ansiud. Tá sé ina sainchomhartha ag imeall an Cathair na hÁingeal ann, go deo. Is féidir liom a fheiceáil go fóill ar an lá glan daichead míle ar shiúl ina ghemreidh anois.

"Trees and Mt. Baldy"

I remember a panorama like this here. I grew up near here. The photograph was taken in Covina when many orchards grew long ago.

Clarence Tucker took this. I reckon he himself was very young then. This view's in 1900. However, he died in 1970.

During that year, I too was young. I was living in Claremont. I played with my friends in the orchard of lemon trees the back of my house.

I saw this same mountain with snow. It's Mt. San Antonio officially. But, everyone locally calls it "Mt. Baldy."

It's about ten thousand miles high up there. It's a landmark around Los Angeles, always. I'm able to see it still on a clear day forty miles away in winter now.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Jennifer Egan's "A Visit From the Goon Squad": Book Review

Nearly 500 reviewers already weighed in on this ambitious novel's wide range of settings, diverse characters, and sprawling, time-leaping plot. Everything from a oddly appealing if annoying kleptomaniac in a fine opening vignette to an Asian dictatorship to an African safari, with lots of New York City, even after climate change, terrorist fears, and more economic collapse, where people keep having babies. Music plays a key role, if not as much as I thought it would (seeing the title cribs from Elvis Costello), and the plot shifts more to fame, fear, and longing, more universal concerns among its unsettled cast of urban and suburban yearners, obsessed with gadgets, social networking exponentially amped into "parrots," and with a familiar litany of angst and dreams, conveyed best of all if unexpectedly in one decaying, parched California high-desert exurb in a poignant chapter related through a girl's Power Point.

The plot's all over the place, literally. Latch on to an appealing young woman on the make and a chapter later, it's another time and another generation. Jennifer Egan manages to keep all her storylines folding into each other, but readers lacking patience may wonder at her intricacy. For me, it worked as entertainment, with the attempted rapist, a journalist in eerie thrall to a despot, and the foibles of journalism best succeeding. However, the African interlude failed to keep my interest, even if I understood why it had its place in character development. For all its range, you can still see the seams showing now and then within the construction. Egan puts a lot of energy into juggling a lot of balls in the air at once.

I chose to hear this with Roxana Ortega's dramatization. (The Power Point's via a click-through slide-show with a quaint projector sound on the tape.) Her often ironic, sneering, blustery, or fragile voice captures effectively the brash attitude of the passel of these often snobbish, insecure, and/or privileged folks, scrabbling their way up the social ladder in cities and exurbs, as the planet weakens under global warming and the media-driven frenzies escalate. Underneath it all, it's a comedy of manners two hundred years after Jane Austen, perhaps. (Amazon US 7-31-12)

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

George Saunders' "Tenth of December": Book Review

Any story George Saunders writes, I'll read. This fourth collection begins with typical toughness mixed with sadness. Mortality and fright return over and over, in landscapes familiar and laboratories unrecognizable--for now. "Victory Lap" gets it off to a stern start with a sassy ballerina-teen and a geode. "Sticks" is much shorter than some in this volume, nearly a vignette about Dad leaving a Santa suit draped "over a kind of crucifix." The next, "Puppy" gives you a sense, if you know Saunders, that it will not end well by its very title. "The cruelty and ignorance just radiated from her fat face, with its little smear of lipstick," as one mother's summed up. This shows Saunders, doggedly watching how his neighbors might act, around his native upstate downscale New York.

 "Escape from Spiderhead" terrifies more than amuses. A shame reducer and verbal stimulant get tested on lab-rat humans, as sex and what seems like love unfold at nearly novella length for the understandably confused narrator. As with many of George Saunders' eerie reports from a near-future corporate realm, neologisms and innovation combine with poignancy and satire. As he's matured, his daring approach has blended into a subtler shift towards tenderness beneath. He hasn't lost his imagination, but he improves upon even the talent of his first collections when he mixes emotion into the ingredients, more than lesser writers who heap on the what-ifs too thickly. Speculative fiction meets domestic anxiety, from a deadpan satirist increasingly skilled at evoking tenderness amidst death and hallucination.

"Sometimes science sucks," as one character concludes. As a geological engineer turned writer, certainly Saunders possesses a knowledge of business and know-how other MFA-schooled products may lack. (See my review of "In Persuasion Nation") He has always mingled the bureaucratic-speak with pop-psych bromides deftly. "Exhortation" sends up the managerial memo lapsing into tell-all e-mail, appropriately. "Al Roosten" about to be introduced by a MC cheerleader too old for braids who in turn promotes herself "as someone who does feng shui for a living" contains its own ready-made humor, "LaffKidsOffCrack" the charity du jour that makes the protagonist feel, amidst bumps and grinds, that he was "deaf to the charity in this." Saunders shows the awkward, forced conviviality of such events, inflated just right. It reminds me of Babbitt meets Pynchon, somehow.

"Home" follows the decay of a relationship, complicated by baby. Court-martial proves a lesser infraction for a returned veteran compared to what life at home and under the sheriff's eye--and Ma--has for him. The more deadpan, mind-numbed, demotic phrasing of everyday downscale folks again finds Saunders applying his ear to the way people talk when tired out and unable to process, full of proverbs, the obvious observations, the phrases from TV: "Not on my watch," or "People tend to focus on the negative."

With "My Chivalric Fiasco," TorchLightNight starts with a "voluntary fling" admission and moves to a pigpen with fake pigs and a tilting bed, with the narrator "the only currently working person in our family." A fake-medieval tone intervenes thanks to a 100 mg of KnightLyfe, and this allows Saunders to enjoy the Renaissance Faire scenario and diction that giddily and disturbingly ensues for "Improv."

Appropriately, the first sentence of "Tenth of December" has a "pale boy with unfortunate Prince Valiant bangs and cublike mannerisms" hulking about in Dad's white coat. Beavers are to be scrutinized. But, strangeness from the woods ensues, of course. It's more of an action-oriented, psychologically concerned story for Saunders, and in its length it extends into a family saga in miniature, pushing his direction homeward away from the managerial blather and drugged predicaments of his previous characters. Slightly more conventional in intent for all its oddness, it may signal Saunders' desire to leave the lab and cubicle behind for nature's homeland insecurities, with its own terror. (Amazon US 10-24-12; my ARC differs from the published version, apparently. See NYT 1-6-13:  "George Saunders Just Wrote the Best Book You'll Read This Year")

Monday, June 24, 2013

"Thomas Merton + James Laughlin: Selected Letters": Review

"One begins to wonder about this realm, then. What is being prepared for it?": so reflects Merton amidst the death of many prominent figures, on 12/7/63. The gradual shift of this Trappist monk towards re-engagement with the world's suffering, by one who in his mid-twenties sought to flee the secular temptations and to devote himself to seclusion needs no introduction; it's well-known and a fascinating study in itself. Twenty-two years had passed between his entrance into the monastery and the time he wrote these sentences to his agent and friend, the well-off, well-educated James Laughlin. He shared and furthered Merton's connections with the New York literary realm and worldwide intellectual currents that a cloister could not block off. Laughlin founded New Directions, publisher of avant-garde novelists and the modernist poets whom Merton reflected in his own verse. Merton grew increasingly confident by the mid-1950s, taking on the Cold War's military-industrial complex.

So did his essays. As this collection edited well by David D. Cooper frames, in about one-fourth of the extant correspondence between 1945 and Merton's odd, premature death in 1968, we see the independent streak in Merton endure. The initial immersion into asceticism and denial understandably shook Merton up: he fears in early letters that being on the same roster as Henry Miller (whom he resembled and later struck up a friendship with) and Jean Genet might shake up Catholics. He wondered if his own inclusion in an anthology aside Genet or such might indirectly lead some young man into homosexuality; Merton scrupulously asked Laughlin if his own works for New Directions that funded the publication of less successful authors could make him (a term I employ but he does not) what used to be called a near occasion of sin.

However, by 1956, a change comes. As the Beats and rock stimulated the culture, so Merton might have been jolted. He begins to read Buddhism and ask about Zen. He no longer signs his monastic name in the very same letter where first he raises this interest, intriguingly. Laughlin must have labored well to assist Merton in obtaining books; consider this is but one of a series of volumes where Laughlin writes at length and in depth to such as W.C. Williams, Rexroth, Schwartz, Pound, and Miller at the same time. There's an affection on the page, even as the contents tend as the years go on to fill with worries over censorship by Merton's Order, the tensions of the superpowers, the war in Vietnam, and the pull of a nurse with whom Merton fell in love in 1966 (discreetly and sensitively handled by the editor and both correspondents; an afterword includes Laughlin's letter to her, tracked down over a year after Merton's death), and Laughlin's nimble recollections of his friend.

I agree with Laughlin that once one reads Merton, however imperfect some of his verse could be, one keeps on. His voice, approachable, ironic, sensitive, intellectual, compassionate, admonitory: it expresses insight and acuity. He's intellectual without posing as an academic, a committed priest who learned to let go of the narrowness of his call in its remote setting, so as to embrace the wider community. He gently early on encourages Laughlin towards faith, reminding him how a ritual rewards the body, which needs its own satisfaction along with the tug of the mind or pull of the soul.

Ultimately, the message Merton by the mid-50s articulates places him in the progressive movement's vanguard. His list of what he reads, who he writes to, what he knows, shows his curiosity and his drive to not cut any ties with society even as he seeks a hermitage to retreat to within the monastery's expanse. This energy, as he burrows down there in Kentucky even as he travels now and then before his final journey to Asia, compels him, and the need to resort to a mimeographed form of transmitting what the Order feared when they stopped him from publishing in print political anti-war, anti-nuclear content demonstrates his decision to address the "pestilence" of a dark time as a priest who had to act.

One passage stands out. On 11/26/63, Merton tells of the reaction in the monastery to JFK's murder. While he sympathizes with his family, he feels "more sorry for the national dance of death." That is, he reminds Laughlin of what I have never before seen publicized. The speech to have been delivered by Kennedy in Dallas was read in the monastic refectory. It's a "symptom of our whole condition," and revealing. "Strange thing: he lists all the increase in our weapons, missiles, bombs, polaris submarines etc. etc., and after doing so says that this would put a stop to any sinister plans of aggressors and.  .  . assassins. With all those missiles and submarines, all it took to do him in was a rifle and two bullets--one extra for the Governor of Texas." (234) Merton suggests this "angle" has "unconsciously unnerved people" and it unsettled me when I read his take on this mythic event. As far removed as he was from the non-stop media coverage that blanketed the nation then, he pinpoints the larger problem, and he refuses to idolize one who after all was responsible for some of the violence. One again sees the boldness of Merton's vision, and why he remained outspoken in his wisdom in a confusing age: he helped some of us react to it differently than did more popular media.

The contents show Laughlin's support and Merton's quest as it unfolds over more than twenty years. True, it's necessarily bogged down sometimes with details about what to print next, what needs editing, who wrote what, but this shows the passion with which Merton and Laughlin sustained their mutual support to connect him with a readership that at New Directions might not otherwise be open (then or now) to reading a Catholic convert's works. I also noticed how publications did not accept all of his articles or poems after his fame; you do get the sense Merton produced an enormous amount, and he seems to have an eye on practically publishing it all, even if not all of it during his lifetime.

Merton grows up to accept his burdens that he thought once might be relieved of him as a monk. He takes on more, willingly, and while he chafes at some of his adopted home's strictures, he loves the place and you read this collection understanding how he depended upon Laughlin to negotiate his intellectual journey as his mediator and yearly visitor, who enabled Merton to find us as his audience. Navigating between solitude and engagement, isolation and intimacy, Merton's again worth reading.
(Amazon US 5-18-13)

Saturday, June 22, 2013

"Selected Letters of Allen Ginsberg + Gary Snyder": Review

Having finished "The Gary Snyder Reader" last month, I wondered how this collection might illuminate some of the contexts as Snyder's wanderings across Beat San Francisco, early-'60s Japan, and back to settle in first Marin County and then the Sierras connect with Ginsberg's New York (city and then upstate) and West Coast residences. Both, furthermore, roam far as they become countercultural spokesmen. Early on, both found success, Ginsberg in the spotlight of course, and then, after his Asian travels, Snyder's poetry finding more recognition.

While Ginsberg's reputation earned him the headline role, Snyder's influence as this series 1956-1991 documents reveals him as the guide. Ginsberg's attraction to Buddhism appears more gradual, as Snyder had preceded him and nearly every other young (non-Asian or a few academics excepted) American. I looked for a pivotal shift to acceptance of Buddhism by Ginsberg in the letters, but it's occluded. Perhaps an early-'60s trip to Asia and extended visit with Snyder in Japan can be credited.

Yet the pull of the possibilities that expanded consciousness exerted on these eager seekers tugs early. 8/10/60, Snyder expresses disgust with American politics and foreign policy. "Bread and Circuses. No longer a problem of helping out American workers, but of giving up for the whole world welfare...will America ever choose to be a bodhisattva? and wear blue jeans and sandals before the world and give up her property? The 'orgy' has political and metaphysical significance." (31) I guess he got the fashion trend right, at least. Anticipating often this decade the inevitable triumph of socialism if not communism, Snyder fears its "one pair of glasses" as well as the capitalist insanity, and expresses nascent fears of climate collapse and economic inequality.

From Kyoto, writing to Allen and Peter Orlovsky in Calcutta 5/30/62, Gary notes that his Japanese buddies have turned hemp farmers. His future neighbor and rival for Sierra land control, Don Allen (soon to be Swami Kriyananda) appears: "Extremely interested in Buddhism" and the interest starts to spread among their circles. Snyder notes "two things going: 1. The individual working out his path by lonely self-enquiry and meditation. 2. A kind of social-sexual communal breakthrough, aided by drugs, dance, music, (meditation), etc. Now if we can reconcile these two and use them we can remake society utterly. (Cosmo-political project #1)" (55)

How close did these comrades come? By 4/29/66, Snyder maps out four steps to a "bodhisatva path": Zen's samadhi power to apply to love (-making) and turning energy into art as "one's work or craft" and through that into "Action politically" to make "the social happen, correcting and reforming, revolution, so that people will be good to each other and to nature, and come to have enough stock of good-humor, curiosity, faith, and bodhi to try" Zen. (80) It's as simple--or complex--as that.

On 1/7/73, Snyder--worried about the carpet-bombing of North Vietnam--quotes from a Chinese text to Ginsberg, by now trying to go back to the land himself near Cherry Valley in upstate New York: "After Niu-t'ou heard the teaching of Zen he gave up sitting all day in his cave and carried 300 bushels of rice to feed people thru a famine." (148-149). The engagements of both Snyder and Ginsberg with activism remain more as undercurrent, as they roam the milieu where campuses, writers' or monastic retreats, awards ceremonies, and media appearances especially for Ginsberg take precedence. There's a guardedness about some of this period, as with Ginsberg's asides more than details debates over Trungpa and also Tim Leary's 1970s activities. Between confidants, it's odd to me that there's not more to reveal here. The 70s on find both men settled into teaching and traveling.

I expected much more herein about Buddhism as a radical force for transformation, given the prominence of both men in the literary and cultural realms. Ginsberg does betray at one point midway a sense of weariness with lineages, lamas, and the Naropa disembodied poetics scene in the 1970s. Yet, despite the publisher's claim that this volume, edited by Ginsberg's archivist and chosen biographer Bill Morgan, it's much more filled with asides about such as controversial lama Chogyam Trungpa, lots of itineraries as both poets flew around the world to give lectures, attend conferences, and hob-nob with A-listers. Increasingly, the pages by the 70s demonstrate a telling alteration. The spiritual issues fade, and while Ginsberg does three times over the decades weigh in with critiques about Snyder's verse drafts, poetry itself occupies not much space. Instead, we follow disputes with the Swami, the building of the zendo, like-minded neighbors coming in to join Snyder, tax concerns over what became the Ring of Bone in the San Juan Ridge of the Sierras, and the more mundane negotiations of the two writers as they bought property and as Snyder established a "village-temple."

The "real work" as Snyder sums up this stage marks change. Ideas and fantasies took root in concrete and a community. While I continue to wonder why the two and their allies did not buy an old summer camp and convert that rather than move themselves (and this leads to hundreds more as the Swami's foundation and the zendo both drew more to settle in the region) into unoccupied space, Kitkitdizze does represent the fruition of their hopes for (one hopes a small-scale) return to nature and renewal.

The collection closes suddenly in 1995; no idea why the correspondence ceases nearly two years before Ginsberg's death. Morgan provides no editorial conclusion; his footnotes tend to be sporadic, explaining some concepts and people referred to but leaving a few misspellings of proper names in the letters and a few references stay too vague for a likely reader. The editor's light touch lets Ginsberg and especially Snyder converse without much interference; there's an index of those named.

Snyder and Ginsberg met in the "strong but reticent Bay Area poetic culture" in the fall of 1955. They, along with Jack Kerouac, managed to move that scene "into public light, with a deliberate intention for some sort of transformation, first literary and then social." In over 350 letters, it's intriguing to find how much of a legacy both young men, dropping out of grad school, left over the next half-century. Snyder typically sums up in his prefatory note their relationship of "mutual respect": "I made him walk more and he made me talk more." (ix) (Amazon US 5-16-13)

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Gary Snyder's "The Real Work": Book Review

After reviewing Gary Snyder's "Reader" and his letters to and from Allen Ginsberg recently, I wanted to learn more about Snyder's relationship to his adopted Nevada County and Northern Californian bioregion during the 1970s. This collection compiles conversations mainly from that decade with the counterculture press, his "East West" in-depth interview which delves deeper into his past and his vision, and an elaboration of his model of the ecological system reaching its climax and sustaining itself by 40% recycling at its steady state of flourishing.

Towards the end he applies this to a restoration of our "inner potential" as our own "sense-detritus" finds liberation by art, work, and creativity. This "fruiting" happens for Snyder throughout this anthology. Editor Scott McLean adds a preface and endnotes to supplement some of Snyder's observations.

Notable is his ability to see within the planet its capacity for our emotional rather than economic enrichment. "It's a problem of love: not the humanistic love of the West--but a love that extends to animals, rocks, dirt, all of it. Without this love, we can end, even without war, with an uninhabitable place." (4) This 1964 Gene Fowler interview captures his "power-vision in solitude."

Yet, he cannot sustain such alone. He returns from a Japanese monastic stint to California, and he eventually joins Gov. Jerry Brown's Arts Council to disburse funds. He believes in the public commitment of the poet and the need to work one's craft and employ one's hands to create.

He even envisions culture, therefore, with fresh eyes. He compares a university's English department to "a cardboard box that everybody throws every poetry magazine that comes in the mail into and says, 'Well, we'll look at that later. I haven't got time to read it now.'" The retrospective perspective of English, "looping backward as they go, and trying to connect" the present to tradition, to rediscover a Blake or a Melville, represents its own function and "truly tribal work," he adds. (63, Fall 1977 to Paul Geneson in "The Ohio Review.")

Such observations reverberate in a period where fewer praise the humanities: he warns of the difficulty that more and more we face as the liberal arts get jettisoned. Practicality, all the same, gets to be its own necessity, for Snyder compares in the five-day April 1977 "East West" interview the contemporary reality for a practitioner as contrasted with the state of monastic Tibet, a quarter of its population meditating, its class structure demonstrating "a byproduct of exploitation"--if someone else grows your food, this cannot be kept on "for a whole lifetime without somebody else having to give up their meditation so that 'you' can meditate." (96)

Therefore, Snyder insists on the poet's grounding in the real and the engaged. Yet I found the same distancing here as elsewhere from the impact of his entry into the Sierras and the attraction this sparked for his followers and friends to join him. "Tracking Down the Natural Man" with carpenter Colin Kowal, whom is to be assumed as one of those who moved there--expresses little worry about the population increase. I suppose Snyder figures he and his colleagues weigh less heavy upon the land.

Similarly, he harbors in these reflections about the nuclear threats and ecological breakdown less tension than in the essays he included in the "Reader" but this unease certainly persists in the interviews during the aftermath of the 1960s. Peter Barry Chowka continues in the "East West" interview to ask about Snyder's "Buddhist Anarchism" essay originally 1961, revised 1969. He reminds us how Buddhism as with Asia did not discover until the last century what the West had earlier: "that history is arbitrary and that societies are human." (101) Not being divine or natural creations, changes and choices can be made. For Eastern systems, compromises with power diminished critiques of state or nation. He elaborates how "World Religions" tend to prop up their societies, and even if they posit liberation, they give in to protect their sub-cultural enclave. Celibacy deepens this institution: it's renewed from the outside each generation, so a tribal accumulation of transformational energy passed down does not build up and threaten the social construct. A fascinating insight.

One final point merits notice in a talk that three-dozen or so years later demands attention. Responding to Chowka's question whether Snyder plays the disconnected muse, Snyder boasts that he worked "nine months on a tanker at sea and nobody once ever guessed I had been in college." (111) This sort of reverse snobbery, arguably logical, does enter parts of this as it has his other writings. Snyder's lucky to have lived his long life so applauded by so many, and he's labored to build on the land his dream. Whether this sort of stance makes him more admirable than his MFA counterparts in the seminar room and his acolytes in the academy remains, perhaps, open to debate.

The appeal of Snyder is that he comes across directly, a bit prickly but usually openhearted. He's eager to express his ecological philosophy and his poetic calling, but he's also mindful to place his vocation within his setting and his respect for nature. Without being sentimental or coy, he helps us to listen to and see our world better. (5-25-13 Amazon US)

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

"The Gary Snyder Reader": Book Review

Over six hundred pages, two-thirds of these essays, articles, journals, and interviews, the rest original poetry and Asian translations, this anthology 1999 offers a deep introduction and thorough investigation of a writer I regard as a thinker but also as a worker. As a poem about Japanese loggers ends: "the pain/ of the work/ of wrecking the world" infuses his perspective. He's freer of the usual academic traps, even though he lectures at UC Davis, and his residence in the Sierras and his forestry, logging, and Zen monk training provide richer material for him to excavate, sift, ponder, and return to for half a century.

Early on, he stayed wary of temptation: "(Beware of anything that promises freedom or enlightenment-- traps for eager and clever fools-- a dog has a keener nose-- every creature in a cave can justify itself. Three-fourths of philosophy and literature is the talk of people trying to convince themselves that they really like the cage they were tricked into entering.)" [24:X (1956, Kyoto) p. 29]

This may let off of a whiff of an air that many well-schooled and meditatively "cool" Beats to me possessed, a dash at least of reverse snobbery by a 1951 graduate of Reed, as in a revealing 1977 East-West Journal interview. "I can pride myself on the fact I've worked nine months on a tanker at sea and nobody once ever guessed I had been to college." (105) Still, on the hundred acres he and Allen Ginsberg bought around 1969 and he named Kitkitdizze after the Nisenan word for an aromatic shrub, Snyder reified his back-to-nature convictions. He never explains why he chose to build on open space (if logged generations before) rather than, say, settle on already occupied land in his native Northwest, but he surely provides better care for his Shasta Nation Yuba River watershed than those who, attracted as he and then early-1970s hippies to the same terrain nearby, have torn it up for golf courses, tract homes, and retirement communities. The tension between development and sustainability underlies many essays here, as Snyder labors to improve the quality of his residence and to educate his neighbors on this small ridge of Turtle Island.

In it for the long haul, as a native Californian I understand Snyder's appeal to all of us who live here. No matter where we've come from, or our ancestors, he encourages us to recognize this fragile series of bioregions as a wonderful and lovely new home. The price paid for this settling (no matter how ecologically educated or real-estate flipping?) is very apparent. He cites a "friend who still gets emotional when he recalls how the avocado orchards of his southern Californian youth landscape were transformed into hillside after hillside of suburbs." (184) He avers that between the ages of about six and ten, a childhood place enters us. For me, it was between eight and eleven, and lemons instead of avocados, but I suffer the same enduring impact as a local witness to what replaced my memories.

These excerpts from 1990's The Practice of the Wild alert one to the sensitivity needed to hear our locale's presence. Rocks as well as trees can speak if the imprint of humans is not too heavy, even for those of us who live in the city. Bioregionalism, for those in the "flat crowded lowlands" as well as the fewer lucky enough to make a living in the less hectic highlands or on the cooler, pricier coasts, can recognize how our political and social structures fight against the place we wish to settle down in. Digging in, for Snyder in the Sierra Nevada foothills, represents a stand. True republicanism, he reminds us, means not distancing squabbles to be arbitrated by monied or judicial entities. It means working out differences with adversaries.

This ties to the "Buddhism and the Possibilities of a Planetary Culture" principles, the 1969 version reprinted here of his 1961 manifesto for a principled anarcho-pacifism. Utopian as it may sound then or now, it remains a prescient call for resisting, anticipating what the Occupy Movement tried to replace forty/fifty years later. As he expands his stance in The Practice of the Wild: "People fear the small society and the critique of the State. It is difficult to see, when one has been raised under it, that it is the State itself which is inherently greedy, destabilizing, entropic, disorderly, and illegitimate." (195) Critics throw back "parochialism, regional strife, 'unacceptable' expressions of cultural diversity," but Snyder ripostes: "Our philosophies, world religions, and histories are biased towards uniformity, universality, and centralization-- in a word, the ideology of monotheism." (195) As a Buddhist, Snyder counters with small-scale economics of a householder, eco-activist, and cultivator.

He finds this "earth house hold" in the swoop from Big Sur up through his place of birth on a dairy farm north of Seattle that came up against second-growth woods, and then into British Columbia, and over Alaska down to Hokkaido across the Japanese islands where he studied as a monk, and over to China. This, his chosen Pacific Rim regional affiliation, draws him in many journals and essays excerpted here into its past (he evokes the largest city of medieval times, Hang-chou, marvelously as he shows us its archived chronicles down to where to find the tastiest pig roasted in coals) and its present traces of its ancient, indigenous mindset.

Alert to contradictions beneath the surface we see and tread, Snyder's earth never sleeps. "Life in the wild is not just eating berries in sunlight," he warns. (209) Depth ecology demands scrutiny of what's fermenting and digesting in the dark. This may require him to open up his Sierra home to bugs and deer, squirrels and ticks. In threat, decay, and migration, life's rhythms also pulse. Insights may emerge for those bold enough to look inside. "The other side of the 'sacred' is the sight of your beloved in the underworld, dripping with maggots." (210) In this spirit world, he seeks communication. Poetry, myth, lore amassed to be critiqued not only in seminars but in the field: Snyder takes the reader out into the wilderness, and unlike all but a few scholars, he practices what he preaches as he leaves trails behind, and literally crawls where bears do to figure out what they do do.

In one such lair, where the rock art left thousands of years ago in caves of the Dordogne and the Pyrenees beckons, Snyder demonstrates the wonder of what our ancestors knew and left even as their language faded. He quotes T.S. Eliot on the Magdalenian discoveries of his own decade: "art never improves." (393) Instead of assuming progress, Snyder counters that primitive creators already had found their truths.  "The deep past confounds the future by suggesting how little we are agreed upon on what is good." The humans were not depicted; aurochs were. Men and women did not need to paint themselves into their environment, not long after they emerged to portray it 35,000 years ago.

Similarly, the verses Snyder follows his prose with, opening with seven strong selections from Riprap (1959), depict his self-assurance as he climbs mountains and looks down on his own traces there. The first one, "Mid-August at Sourdough Mountain Lookout," returns to the first pages, with his 1952 journal as a Forestry Surface lookout for fires (before he fell foul of McCarthyism and had to take the side of the loggers to make his living). It scans the space he has chosen to explore ever since his teens: "I cannot remember things I once read/ A few friends, but they are in cities./ Drinking cold snow-water from a tin cup/ Looking down for miles/ Through high still air." (399)

Two hundred-plus pages follow but already the path is clear in his poems. That first inclusion as lodestar or compass directs us. He aligns the precise suggestion of Asian approaches, which diverge from the symbolic weight of Western contemporary verse, while he lengthens the suggestive lines of simpler spoken predecessors such as Williams. (See more on this in the letters with Allen Ginsberg here reviewed by me.) Snyder edges past the natural settings of the Golden State familiar if made more looming and ominous to Jeffers, and skates over the gnomic density of Pound, Yet he shares Pound's knack for dangling the reader within a suddenly visual suspension. Analyzing natural (are any truly inorganic?) components within the environs he passes through, Snyder reveals by his long crunchy or mulchy march across the world's surface its gaps and its seams. He distances himself from his own footfall; he waits for us to join him--as he listens to the echoes. (Amazon US 4-24-13)

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Ag lorg Virginia Dare

Nuair bhí mé níos óg, chonaic mé an grianghraf chomh seo ó Fhíonghoirt Virginia Dare ina leabhar faoi an réigúin dúiche agam. Níos mó ná céad bliain ó shin, chuir sé 2500 bairillí fíona in aghaidh na bliana. Bhí sé ag an gcoirnéal ó Foothill agus Haven i gCucamonga.

Bhí mé ag gcónaí cúpla míle siar i gClaremont ansin. Is cuimhne liom ag fhéiceail bhfíongoirt ag imeall an cheantair thoir. Ith mé uair amháin ag Ósta Seiceamar d'aois ag bunaoídh ag bhlian 1848, in aice leis an fhíonghoirt síos an príomh-bhóthar sin of Foothill; is breá ag ithe ar an sean-"barbeque" Fraincis ag ainmithe Robaire leis an boladh deathaithe an-iontach.

Mar sin, rúg mé is luaithe leis an grá le oidhreacht áitiúil ó Impireacht Intíre. Bhí maith liom ag dul a imirt leis spraoi ina úlloird taobh thiar do mo theach. Bhí crannaí agus fhíonghoirt i mó blianta múnlaitheachaí.

Anois, níl beagnach aon láithreacht talmhaíochta ann. Tá an-áit seo ag insint scéal seo. Is é seo an túr mar chuid oifig pháirc.

Ar ndóigh, tú ábalta chuir cuairt cúpla bhfíonghort seo caite. Maireachtáil siad ach faoi línte leichtreachais. Timpeall orthu, líonann an talamh lom agus tirim an stórais agus títhe.

Searching for Virginia Dare.

When I was very young, I saw a photograph like this of Virginia Dare Winery [vineyards] in a book about my native region. Over a century ago, it produced 2500 barrels of wine annually. It was at the corner of Foothill and Haven in Cucamonga.

I was living a few miles west in Claremont then. I remember seeing the vineyards around the eastern district. I ate once at the Sycamore Inn founded in 1848, near the vineyard down that main road of Foothill; I loved eating at an old French barbeque called Robaire's with a wonderful smoky smell.

Therefore, I grew up at the earliest with a love for the local heritage of the Inland Empire. I liked to go to play in orchards. There were trees and vineyards in my formative years.

Now, there's almost no agricultural presence there. This very place tells this story. This tower is part of an office park.

However, you're able to visit a couple of the last vineyards. They survive only under electric powerlines. Around them, the dry barren land fills with warehouses and houses.

Friday, June 14, 2013

J.G. Farrell's "The Singapore Grip" Book Review

As the Japanese invade, the British in the colony of Singapore cluster. "Between the pudding, which was prunes and custard, and the cheese, things continued to go wrong at a comfortable rate." So the colonists hear as their troops give way and the enemy advances.

J.G. Farrell follows "The Siege of Krishnapur" and "Troubles" with the last in what has been called his Empire Trilogy. Similar to Paul Scott's Raj Quartet composed around the same time, in the 1970s, Farrell shares a fascination with the intrigue of imperialism as felt and furthered by the middle management ranks--unlike Scott, there's less of an attempt to dramatize a native reaction to the overlords. Scott sifts in satirical touches, while Farrell delights in them. This suits Farrell fine, for his predilection remains to analyze the rationalizations of capitalists, here Walter heading a rubber firm, and do-gooder Matthew, the son of his recently deceased rival. They encounter enough difficulties as it is. Natives might only complicate matters more, as WWII breaks out.

As Matthew lands, he shrinks. "The heat was suddenly stifling: he was clad in it from head to toe, as if wrapped in steaming towels." (102) Farrell describes a place he knew first by study and the draft of his novel (works consulted are appended) before he visited there for confirming his research. Matthew will get used to what Walter has grown up with, "listening to the tropical night which like some great machine had begun its humming, whirring and clicking, steadily growing in volume as the darkness deepened." (51)

Matthew falls for Walter's daughter Joan, a wonderfully manipulative beauty whose sheer cynicism and calculation seems to her hapless set-up suitor (the Blacketts want to unite their firm with the one which Matthew Webb looks set to inherit) so unmatched. Her ministrations find competition with another enigmatic woman, Vera Chiang, whose verisimilitude, half-Russian "princess," half-Chinese, we never figure out, and out of such lacunae, Farrell places us within Matthew's confusion neatly.  Names are often suitable for characters, as two of the surnames above indicate.

This third installment has been downplayed by comparison with the Booker Prize-winning pair by Farrell preceding it, but I found it far more enjoyable than the dour even by (Anglo-)Irish standards Troubles. In its doomed verve and witty dialogue, it recalls Siege much more, to their mutual advantage. As disaster hits yet another outpost of the Crown, we see the same fate that befell India in the Sepoy Mutiny or Ireland in the War of Independence. "In front of the temple, like an offering, a dead man lay in the gutter under a buzzing, seething black shroud." (552)

Derek Mahon in his brief introduction alludes to Farrell's increasing adoption of a Buddhist pose of sorts before his sudden death (a polio victim early on, he was swept into Bantry Bay in 1979 while fishing on the rocks in a gust). The sentence above demonstrates such a stance, but most of the book throws off this attitude: as you read, you look forward to a dramatic climax.

Yet, it refuses to follow the conventional buildup to a big pay-off, and this veering away from the expected pattern of a narrative, heightened by the stance of its teller, may frustrate readers. It's more nuanced, and while I liked this decision to downplay the love-war genre, it may feel a limper ending for some. Similarly, Walter and Vera may succumb to resignation or a very subtle form of sensible endurance, as a too-short coda rushes past what befell the future of Farrell's characters, seen now and then by an omniscient, wry narrator.

A flying boat manages to escape just in time, "leaving the chaos and destruction of Singapore as nothing but a tiny smudge on the horizon , insignificant compared with the vast, shining sea below them." (522) Out of such wondrous scenes, the fruitless folly of Walter's attempt to profit from the wartime rubber demand, as it rots on the docks under Japanese bombardment, diminishes. What we find instead, closing this ambitious novel, becomes less fixed and more ambiguous, not to be clung to but to be let go of. Perhaps this is a Buddhist novel after all, Farrell's prematurely last fiction. (Amazon US, 10-23-12)

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Paul Scott's "A Division of the Spoils": Book Review

This closes the great Raj Quartet.  Six hundred closely printed pages of the Everyman's Library edition with "The Towers of Silence" close the saga of the terrible, enigmatic, yet not to be unpitied Ronald Merrick's entry into the lives of Hari Kumar, the Laytons, and most of all two new characters, Nigel Rowan and Guy Perron, both serving in the military in India at the end of WWII. The war's conclusion means Perron will finagle an escape from service back to England, but he will return, and his story, sometimes conveyed through first-person narration, once in a while by diaries, dominates this novel.

Early on, Perron after four years enlisted "had learned to look upon the entire war as an under-rehearsed and over-directed amateur production badly in need of cutting." (415, Everyman ed.)  The fears of having to attack the Japanese fade as the news of the atom bomb, heard first in "Towers" as Barbie Batchelor's crumbling sanity reflects the breakdown of the old order of the British Raj, ebb for Guy and Nigel and their comrades, although one, in a powerful character study, cannot cope.

Captain Purvis suffers from an intestinal ailment that in "Towers" was posited by a keen observer to account for the short tempers and long lassitude endemic to many British who served in India. Purvis may be a bit of welcome if typically for Scott acerbic comic relief (there are few laughs in this entry). But he also makes a plaintive lament: "Six years! Six years' criminal waste of the world's natural resources and human skills. History, you said?" (431) The unreality of the war he and Guy have just survived, as the mission to invade the Japanese redoubts in Malaya is called off, sinks in.

So, too, is the unreality of the Raj, the sense that now the British will have to leave India after hundreds of years of their own invasion, and their own occupying force takes on an awkward role as Indian independence must be negotiated and Pakistani separation must be established. These efforts serve as the setting for most of "Division."

Merrick, elevated to Lt-Colonel, must take on the vexed situation of how to deal with the Indian National Army, which had fought along with the Japanese against the British Army's sepoys, as its defeated ranks return--to a heroes' welcome among some and a traitors' sentence among others. This divided reaction foreshadows the fate of India, as it too will be split among those who sided with the Crown for so long and those who comprise a Hindu or Muslim majority bent on leaving the Raj behind. Mirat, symbolically and practically as partition looms, faces its own demise, the princely state the center of much of the action of "The Jewel in the Crown" and "The Day of the Scorpion."

The Colonel in his own complicated (this being a British novel as well as a colonial one) class status finds in his nemesis Hari Kumar a like-minded individual determined to advance his own chances in the power structure. Kumar is off-stage this novel, as he has been in "Towers," but the continuing effects his police case set in motion linger for a bitter, wounded, and clever Merrick as well. In Perron's view (he aspires to be an academic analyst of Indian policy earlier in the Raj preceding the Great Mutiny) Merrick "lacked entirely the liberal instinct which is so dear to historians that they lay it out like a guideline through the unmapped forests of prejudice and self-interest as though this line, and not the forest, is our history." (715) A nice summation of the Whig view of history as progress?

Late in this long stretch into the last days of the British hegemony over the jewel in the crown, Perron goes "through a narrow Moghul arch into a dark stone corridor--the kind in which you feel the weight of India: a heavy darkness which is a protection from glare and heat but reminiscent of tombs and dungeons." (931) Mirat's palace stands for more than itself, naturally.

This novel demands close attention. Using Guy (we also find Sarah Layton in one chapter telling her side) as the key witness, in both indirect and direct narration, proves a smart choice, for as an outsider, he takes us deeper into Merrick's power over those around him. Some events turn out to be momentous, others anti-climactic and offhand, truer to life perhaps than fiction, come to think of it.

While Paul Scott's measured, crafted prose is never difficult yet often beautifully conveyed, you do return to material in previous novels via other people that keeps getting re-interpreted, and layers of accretion continue to slowly rise, inexorably, as Hari Kumar's predicament (does he now understand the difference between karma and dharma?) never leaves any behind who've heard of it. Scott combines this gradual accumulation of detail intricately, as in a splendid comparison to a political cartoonist's depiction of a great sale clearance of India as if some grand department store and bazaar with disparate customers lining up and entering or exiting. Even a fish souffle takes on, in his careful detail, a sectarian as well as culinary resonance in one scene.

Over the considerable time I have invested in the Quartet, I wondered if the subject matter needed such Proustian evocation and Tolstoyan scope. I leave that to critics, but the four installments allow us a marvelous way for the patient reader to delve into the impact of sectarianism, politics, war, imperialism, and ambition within a convoluted study of manners, as if the English novel in the mode of Jane Austen's characters meets Thackeray's social commentary, mixed moreover with historiography and analysis. It ends movingly, as one climactic scene reverberates as a harbinger of what India and Pakistan will contend over in the summer of 1947, and in the decades to come. (Amazon US 7-21-12; see also a brief review of the Everyman's Library ed. of vols. 1-2.)